> 2. Currently supporting Flink1.17 is difficult, but are there any plans to > support it in the future? Do we need to wait for Hadoop related repositories > to release specific versions.
Flink1.17 => JDK17 > 2024年10月23日 11:19，Yanquan Lv <decq12y...@gmail.com> 写道： > > Hi Feri, > Thank you for bringing up this discussion. > I agree to release a version to bump the newer version of Flink with partial > JDK versions support. I have two points to be discussed. > 1. I have heard many inquiries about supporting higher versions of Flink in > Slack, Chinese communities, etc., and a large part of them hope to use it on > Flink1.20. Should we consider explicitly supporting Flink1.20 on version 4.0, > otherwise users will have to wait for a relatively long release cycle. > 2. Currently supporting Flink1.17 is difficult, but are there any plans to > support it in the future? Do we need to wait for Hadoop related repositories > to release specific versions. > > >> 2024年10月22日 19:44，Ferenc Csaky <ferenc.cs...@pm.me.INVALID> 写道： >> >> Hello devs, >> >> I would like to start a discussion regarding a new HBase connector release. >> Currently, the >> externalized HBase connector has only 1 release: 3.0.0 that supports Flink >> 1.16 and 1.17. >> >> By stating this, it is obvious that the connector is already outdated for >> quite a while. There >> is a long-lasting ticket [1] to release a newer HBase version, which also >> contains a major version >> bump as HBase 1.x support is removed, but covering JDK17 with the current >> Hadoop related >> dependency mix is impossible, because there are parts that do not play well >> with it when you >> try to compile with JDK17+, and there are no runtime tests as well. >> >> Solving that properly will require to bump the HBase, Hadoop, and Zookeeper >> versions as well, >> but that will require more digging and some refactoring, at least on the >> test side. >> >> To cut some corners and move forward I think at this point it would make >> sense to release >> version 4.0 that supports Flink 1.18 and 1.19 but only on top of JDK8 and >> JDK11 just to close the >> current gap a bit. I am thinking about including the limitations in the java >> compat docs [2] to >> highlight users. >> >> WDYT? >> >> Best, >> Ferenc >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35136 >> [2] >> https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-release-1.19/docs/deployment/java_compatibility/ >
