Hi, Gyula, is there had any progress in FLINK-33548? I would like to join the discussion but I haven't seen any discussion in the url.
I also make flinkdeployment by flink operator, which indeed will override the process size by TaskmanagerSpec.resources or JobmanagerSpec.resources, which really confused, I had modified the code of flink operator to avoid the override. Looking for your response. Thank you. Richard Su > 2023年12月5日 16:22，Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> 写道： > > Hi! > > Please see the discussion in > https://lists.apache.org/thread/6p5tk6obmk1qxf169so498z4vk8cg969 > and the ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33548 > > We should follow the approach outlined there. If you are interested you are > welcome to pick up the operator ticket. > > Unfortunately your PR can be a large unexpected change to existing users so > we should not add it. > > Cheers, > Gyula > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 9:05 AM 苏超腾 <richardsuc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello everyone, >> >> I've encountered an issue while using flink kubernetes native, Despite >> setting resource limits in the pod template, it appears that these limits >> and requests are not considered during JobManager(JM) and TaskManager (TM) >> pod deployment. >> >> I find the a issue had opened in jira FLINK-24150, which introduced >> almost the same questions that I encountered. >> >> I agrees that if user had provided pod templates, we should put priority >> on it higher than flink calculated from configuration. >> >> But this need some discussion in our community, because it related some >> scenarios: >> If I want to create a pod with Graranted QoS and want the memory of the >> Flink main container to be larger than the process size of Flink, I cannot >> directly modify podTemplate (although we can use limit factor, this will >> cause the QoS to change from Graranted to Burstable) >> If I want to create a pod with Burstable QoS, I don't want to use limit >> actor and want to directly configure the request to be 50% of the limit, >> which cannot be modified. >> In order to meet these scenarios, I had committed a pull request >> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23872 >> >> This code is very simple and just need someone to review, this pr can be >> cherry pick to other old version, which will be helpful. >> >> >> I would appreciate any feedback on this. >> >> Thank you for your time and contributions to the Flink project. >> >> Thank you, >> chaoran.su
