Hi Jing,
I just spotted the mailing list that it is a regression – I agree it is a
blocker,
Kind regards, David.
From: David Radley <david_rad...@uk.ibm.com>
Date: Friday, 27 October 2023 at 10:33
To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: flink-sql-connector-jdbc new release
Hi Jing,
thanks are there any processes documented around getting a release out. Out of
interest what is your thinking around this being a blocker? I suspect it is not
a regression, but a really nice to have, WDYT,
Either way it looks interesting – I am going to have a look into this issue to
try to move it along– could you assign it to me please,
Kind regards, David.
From: Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com>
Date: Friday, 27 October 2023 at 06:54
To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: flink-sql-connector-jdbc new release
Hi David,
Thanks for driving this.
I think https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33365 should be a blocker.
Best,
Jingsong
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 11:43 PM David Radley <david_rad...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I propose that we do a 3.2 release of flink-sql-connector-jdbc so that there
> is a version matching 1.18 that includes the new dialects. I am happy to
> drive this, some pointers to documentation on the process and the approach to
> testing the various dialects would be great,
>
> Kind regards, David.
>
>
> Unless otherwise stated above:
>
> IBM United Kingdom Limited
> Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU
Unless otherwise stated above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited
Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU
Unless otherwise stated above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited
Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU
