Hi Jing,
I also found the exception about the java.lang.NoSuchMethodError when I ran the
Kyuubi Flink Tests on Flink1.18-rc2.
These are the steps, ran the below sql in the Flink SQL Client:
create table tbl_src (a int) with ('connector' = 'datagen', 'number-of-rows' =
'100’);
select count(a) from tbl_src;
Could you also update flink1.18-rc2 bianry release[1]
[1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.18.0-rc2/
Best regards,
Xianxun
> 2023年10月18日 10:24，Yun Tang <myas...@live.com> 写道：
>
> Hi Jing,
>
> Thanks for the update, I checked the new maven repo, and the artifacts were
> built with JDK8 correctly.
>
>
> Best
> Yun Tang
> ________________________________
> From: Jing Ge <j...@ververica.com.INVALID>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2023 23:31
> To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org>
> Cc: Matthias Pohl <matthias.p...@aiven.io>; sergey.nuyan...@aiven.io
> <sergey.nuyan...@aiven.io>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.18.0, release candidate #2
>
> Hi Yun,
>
> I have created a new maven repo[5]. Would you like to check it out? Thanks
> for your support! Once I get your confirmation, I will start the second
> voting thread with the title "[VOTE][2] Release 1.18.0, release candidate
> #2", because the source code is not changed.
>
> All Devs: please ignore this thread. I will start a new one as I
> mentioned above.
>
> Best regards,
> Jing
>
> [5] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1659
>
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 3:53 PM Jing Ge <j...@ververica.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Yun,
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback. Appreciate it! I will update them accordingly and
>> then ask you for double checking. Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Jing
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 2:42 PM Yun Tang <myas...@live.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jing,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the update. I checked the new pre-built binary release, and it
>>> works fine now. However, I then checked the pre-built jar packages and
>>> found they are also built with JDK17, e.g., flink-runtime.jar [1].
>>>
>>> I think we also need to update all artifacts to be deployed.
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1658/org/apache/flink/flink-runtime/1.18.0/flink-runtime-1.18.0.jar
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Yun Tang
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: Matthias Pohl <matthias.p...@aiven.io>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2023 20:38
>>> To: dev@flink.apache.org <dev@flink.apache.org>
>>> Cc: Yun Tang <myas...@live.com>; sergey.nuyan...@aiven.io <
>>> sergey.nuyan...@aiven.io>
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.18.0, release candidate #2
>>>
>>> Great catch, Yun Tang. I created FLINK-33291 [1] to cover the issue of
>>> enforcing the JDK (and Maven) version in the release profile.
>>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-33291
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 1:28 PM Jing Ge <j...@ververica.com.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>> Hi Folks,
>>>
>>> I have rebuilt Flink with Java 8 and replaced all binary artifacts at[3].
>>> @Yun
>>> Tang <myas...@live.com<mailto:myas...@live.com>> Would you please check
>>> it again? Thanks!
>>>
>>> BTW, there was a typo in the voting mail:
>>>
>>>>> * source code tag "release-1.17.0-rc2" [6]
>>> it should be:
>>> source code tag "release-1.18.0-rc2" [6]
>>>
>>> Sorry for the inconvenience caused.
>>>
>>> Special thanks for @sergey.nuyan...@aiven.io<mailto:
>>> sergey.nuyan...@aiven.io> <sergey.nuyan...@aiven.io<mailto:
>>> sergey.nuyan...@aiven.io>> who
>>> helps double check the new binary files and found the typo.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Jing
>>>
>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.18.0-rc2
>>> <
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.18.0-rc2/flink-1.18.0-bin-scala_2.12.tgz
>>>>
>>>
>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.18.0-rc2
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 12:27 PM Jing Ge <j...@ververica.com<mailto:
>>> j...@ververica.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Chesnay for the hint! Appreciate it!
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>> Jing
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 11:21 AM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org
>>> <mailto:ches...@apache.org>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> IIRC releases MUST be built with JDK 8.
>>>>>
>>>>> @Yun Tang how did you discover this?
>>>>>
>>>>> There is supposed to be a check to enforce this, but weirdly enough it
>>>>> isn't rejecting my JDK 11 installation :/
>>>>> Ah, we didn't set up the enforcer plugin correctly; while we do set a
>>>>> required JDK version by default this is interpreted as ">=", so
>>> anything
>>>>> above or equal 8 is currently accepted...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 17/10/2023 07:55, Yun Tang wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Jing,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I found the pre-built Flink binary release is built with JDK17[1].
>>>>> Since the default target version is still 1.8 [2] and we did not
>>> mention
>>>>> that building with java17 is supported [3], do we really need to make
>>> the
>>>>> default binary release built with JDK17?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.18.0-rc2/flink-1.18.0-bin-scala_2.12.tgz
>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/f978a77e2b9ade1e89dfb681d4b99fc13c72d2ed/pom.xml#L128
>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>
>>> https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-release-1.18/docs/flinkdev/building/#build-flink
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Yun Tang
>>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>>> From: Lijie Wang <wangdachui9...@gmail.com<mailto:
>>> wangdachui9...@gmail.com>>
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2023 12:42
>>>>>> To: dev@flink.apache.org<mailto:dev@flink.apache.org> <
>>> dev@flink.apache.org<mailto:dev@flink.apache.org>>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.18.0, release candidate #2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Verified the signature and checksum
>>>>>> - Built from the source code
>>>>>> - Ran an example job on yarn cluster
>>>>>> - Checked the website PR
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Lijie
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jing Ge <j...@ververica.com.invalid> 于2023年10月16日周一 18:43写道：
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
>>>>>>> 1.18.0, as follows:
>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific
>>> comments)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>> includes:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1], and the pull request adding release note
>>> for
>>>>>>> users [2]
>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release and binary convenience releases
>>>>> to be
>>>>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org<http://dist.apache.org> [3], which are
>>> signed with the key with
>>>>>>> fingerprint 96AE0E32CBE6E0753CE6 [4],
>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [5],
>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-1.17.0-rc2" [6],
>>>>>>> * website pull request listing the new release and adding
>>> announcement
>>>>> blog
>>>>>>> post [7].
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. It is adopted by
>>> majority
>>>>>>> approval, with at least 3 PMC affirmative votes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Konstantin, Qingsheng, Sergey, and Jing
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12352885
>>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23527
>>>>>>> [3] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.18.0-rc2/
>>>>>>> [4] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>>>>>>> [5]
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1658
>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/flink/releases/tag/release-1.18.0-rc2
>>>>>>> [7] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/680
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
