Hi Conrad, I think we need that confirmation from the original author as part of this discussion thread.
Best regards, Martijn On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 4:13 AM ConradJam <jam.gz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > After email communication between me and the author of the warehouse, he > has agreed to donate to Apache Flink and participate in the design of the > solution. > > @Martlin @Leonard > Yes, it can be said that for clickhouse's connector solution [1] we still > refer to part of the code and implementation of the existing clickhouse > connector [2]. To be precise, we should replace some outdated > implementations. During this process, the author and I hope to make the > following improvements based on the current warehouse after synchronizing > information via email: > ● ClickHouse JDBC is updated to the latest (0.4.6[3] is stable and > available as of the email deadline) > ● Support bool type, delete statement, grpc, tcp > ● Implement new Clickhouse Sink Api (to be confirmed) > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/%5BDRAFT%5D+FLIP-202 > %3A+Introduce+ClickHouse+Connector > [2] https://github.com/itinycheng/flink-connector-clickhouse > [3] https://github.com/ClickHouse/clickhouse-java/releases > > > > Martijn Visser <martijnvis...@apache.org> 于2023年9月20日周三 21:20写道： > > > Hi ConradJam, > > > > The FLIP still references the unofficial "flink-clickhouse-connector" > > which I don't really understand: you want to build a new > > implementation for this connector, right? > > > > Best regards, > > > > Martijn > > > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2023 at 12:12 PM ConradJam <jam.gz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Does anyone else have an opinion on this part? If not I will start > > > voting.Comment collection will be open again > > > > > -- > Best > > ConradJam
