Hi Conrad, Thanks for driving it.
In general I'm +1 however I have a couple of questions 1. From FLIP's description it is not clear whether this connector will support Async sink [1] or not, could you please clarify it? 2. Also may be a bit more details in FLIP's page would helpful why a new connector required instead of existing ClickHouse connector [2] [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-171%3A+Async+Sink [2] https://github.com/itinycheng/flink-connector-clickhouse On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 8:53 AM Jing Ge <j...@ververica.com.invalid> wrote: > Hi Conrad, > > Thanks for driving it! +1 for starting a new round of discussion based on > the input you wrote in the comment. Look forward to the new design. > > Best regards, > Jing > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 8:00 AM ConradJam <jam.gz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Community > > > > I want to re-initiate the discussion related to FLIP-202. This is a > > discussion related to the Clickhouse connector. Some previous discussions > > are summarized in [1] > > > > ● We need an external code warehouse to store this part of code, as > > @Martijn Visser said flink-clickhouse-connector to create > > ● Discuss the current Flink write or sink and clickhouse need to solve > the > > common problems of users > > > > > > Now I want to redesign this part of the function. The relevant FLIP will > be > > updated after collecting opinions. Welcome to join the discussion > > > > [1] FLINK-26999 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-26999> > > ：Introduce > > ClickHouse Connector > > > > > > -- > > Best > > > > ConradJam > > > -- Best regards, Sergey
