Thanks @xingtong for driving the work. +1(binding)
Best, Leonard > On Jul 26, 2023, at 3:18 PM, Konstantin Knauf <knauf.konstan...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi Xingtong, > > yes, I am fine with the conclusion for SourceFunction. I chatted with > Leonard a bit last night. Let's continue this vote. > > Thanks for the clarification, > > Konstantin > > > > Am Mi., 26. Juli 2023 um 04:03 Uhr schrieb Xintong Song < > tonysong...@gmail.com>: > >> Hi Konstantin, >> >> It seems the offline discussion has already taken place [1], and part of >> the outcome is that removal of SourceFunction would be a *nice-to-have* >> item for release 2.0 which may not block this *must-have* vote. Do you have >> different opinions about the conclusions in [1]? >> >> If there are still concerns, and the discussion around this topic needs to >> be continued, then I'd suggest (as I mentioned in [2]) not to further block >> this vote (i.e. the decision on other must-have items). Release 2.0 still >> has a long way to go, and it is likely we need to review and update the >> list every once in a while. We can update the list with another vote if >> later we decide to add the removal of SourceFunction to the must-have list. >> >> WDYT? >> >> Best, >> >> Xintong >> >> >> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/yyw52k45x2sp1jszldtdx7hc98n72w7k >> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/j5d5022ky8k5t088ffm03727o5g9x9jr >> >> On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 8:49 PM Konstantin Knauf <kna...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> I assume this vote includes a decision to not removing >>> SourceFunction/SinkFunction in Flink 2.0 (as it has been removed from the >>> table). If this is the case, I don't think, this discussion has >> concluded. >>> There are multiple contributors like myself, Martijn, Alex Fedulov and >>> Maximilian Michels, who have indicated they would be in favor of >>> deprecating/dropping them. This Source/Sink Function discussion seems to >> go >>> in circles in general. I am wondering if it makes sense to have a call >>> about this instead of repeating mailing list discussions. >>> >>> Am Di., 25. Juli 2023 um 13:38 Uhr schrieb Yu Li <car...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> +1 (binding) >>>> >>>> Thanks for driving this, Xintong! >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> Yu >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, 23 Jul 2023 at 18:28, Yuan Mei <yuanmei.w...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (binding) >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for driving the discussion through and for all the efforts in >>>>> resolving the complexities :-) >>>>> >>>>> Best >>>>> Yuan >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 5:23 PM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd like to start another round of VOTE for the must-have work >> items >>>> for >>>>>> release 2.0 [1]. The corresponding discussion thread is [2], and >> the >>>>>> previous voting thread is [3]. All comments from the previous >> voting >>>>> thread >>>>>> have been addressed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please note that once the vote is approved, any changes to the >>>> must-have >>>>>> items (adding / removing must-have items, changing the priority) >>>> requires >>>>>> another vote. Assigning contributors / reviewers, updating >>>> descriptions / >>>>>> progress, changes to nice-to-have items do not require another >> vote. >>>>>> >>>>>> The vote will be open until at least July 25, following the >> consensus >>>>>> voting process. Votes of PMC members are binding. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> >>>>>> Xintong >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/2.0+Release >>>>>> >>>>>> [2] >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3dkdypyrovd3txzodn07lgdwtwvhgk4 >>>>>> >>>>>> [3] >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/r0y9syc6k5nmcxvnd0hj33htdpdj9k6m >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> https://twitter.com/snntrable >>> https://github.com/knaufk >>> >> > > > -- > *Konstantin Knauf* > knauf.konstan...@gmail.com
