Hi Konstantin, It seems the offline discussion has already taken place [1], and part of the outcome is that removal of SourceFunction would be a *nice-to-have* item for release 2.0 which may not block this *must-have* vote. Do you have different opinions about the conclusions in [1]?
If there are still concerns, and the discussion around this topic needs to be continued, then I'd suggest (as I mentioned in [2]) not to further block this vote (i.e. the decision on other must-have items). Release 2.0 still has a long way to go, and it is likely we need to review and update the list every once in a while. We can update the list with another vote if later we decide to add the removal of SourceFunction to the must-have list. WDYT? Best, Xintong [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/yyw52k45x2sp1jszldtdx7hc98n72w7k [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/j5d5022ky8k5t088ffm03727o5g9x9jr On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 8:49 PM Konstantin Knauf <kna...@apache.org> wrote: > I assume this vote includes a decision to not removing > SourceFunction/SinkFunction in Flink 2.0 (as it has been removed from the > table). If this is the case, I don't think, this discussion has concluded. > There are multiple contributors like myself, Martijn, Alex Fedulov and > Maximilian Michels, who have indicated they would be in favor of > deprecating/dropping them. This Source/Sink Function discussion seems to go > in circles in general. I am wondering if it makes sense to have a call > about this instead of repeating mailing list discussions. > > Am Di., 25. Juli 2023 um 13:38 Uhr schrieb Yu Li <car...@gmail.com>: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks for driving this, Xintong! > > > > Best Regards, > > Yu > > > > > > On Sun, 23 Jul 2023 at 18:28, Yuan Mei <yuanmei.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Thanks for driving the discussion through and for all the efforts in > > > resolving the complexities :-) > > > > > > Best > > > Yuan > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 5:23 PM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I'd like to start another round of VOTE for the must-have work items > > for > > > > release 2.0 [1]. The corresponding discussion thread is [2], and the > > > > previous voting thread is [3]. All comments from the previous voting > > > thread > > > > have been addressed. > > > > > > > > Please note that once the vote is approved, any changes to the > > must-have > > > > items (adding / removing must-have items, changing the priority) > > requires > > > > another vote. Assigning contributors / reviewers, updating > > descriptions / > > > > progress, changes to nice-to-have items do not require another vote. > > > > > > > > The vote will be open until at least July 25, following the consensus > > > > voting process. Votes of PMC members are binding. > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > Xintong > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/2.0+Release > > > > > > > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3dkdypyrovd3txzodn07lgdwtwvhgk4 > > > > > > > > [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/r0y9syc6k5nmcxvnd0hj33htdpdj9k6m > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > https://twitter.com/snntrable > https://github.com/knaufk >
