+1 Best, Junrui
Jing Ge <j...@ververica.com.invalid> 于2023年7月24日周一 23:28写道： > agree, since we want to try our best to deprecate APIs in 1.18, it makes > sense. > > > Best regards, > Jing > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 12:11 PM Wencong Liu <liuwencle...@163.com> wrote: > > > Hi Jing and Matthias, > > > > > > I believe it is reasonable to examine all classes that implement the > > IOReadableWritable > > interface and summarize their actual usage. However, due to time > > constraints, I suggest > > we minimize the scope of this FLIP to focus on the Path class. As for > > other components > > that implement IOReadableWritable, we can make an effort to investigate > > them > > in the future. WDYT? > > > > > > Best regards, > > Wencong Liu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 2023-07-22 00:46:45, "Jing Ge" <j...@ververica.com.INVALID> wrote: > > >Hi Wencong, > > > > > >Thanks for the clarification. I got your point. It makes sense. > > > > > >Wrt IOReadableWritable, the suggestion was to check all classes that > > >implemented it, e.g. BlockInfo, Value, Configuration, etc. Not limited > to > > >the Path. > > > > > >Best regards, > > >Jing > > > > > >On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 4:31 PM Wencong Liu <liuwencle...@163.com> > wrote: > > > > > >> Hello Jing, > > >> > > >> > > >> Thanks for your reply. The URI field should be final and the > > >> Path will be immutable.The static method deserializeFromDataInputView > > >> will create a new Path object instead of replacing the URI field > > >> in a existed Path Object. > > >> > > >> > > >> For the crossing multiple modules issue, I've explained it in the > reply > > >> to Matthias. > > >> > > >> > > >> Best regards, > > >> > > >> > > >> Wencong Liu > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> At 2023-07-21 18:05:26, "Jing Ge" <j...@ververica.com.INVALID> wrote: > > >> >Hi Wencong, > > >> > > > >> >Just out of curiosity, will the newly introduced > > >> >deserializeFromDataInputView() method make the Path mutable again? > > >> > > > >> >What Matthias suggested makes sense, although the extension might > make > > >> this > > >> >FLIP cross multiple modules. > > >> > > > >> >Best regards, > > >> >Jing > > >> > > > >> >On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 10:23 AM Matthias Pohl > > >> ><matthias.p...@aiven.io.invalid> wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> There's a kind-of-related issue FLINK-4758 [1] that proposes > removing > > >> the > > >> >> IOReadableWritable interface from more classes. It was briefly > > >> mentioned in > > >> >> the must-have work items discussion [2]. > > >> >> > > >> >> I'm not too sure about the usage of IOReadableWritable: ...whether > it > > >> would > > >> >> go away with the removal of the DataSet API in general (the Jira > > issue > > >> has > > >> >> DataSet as a component), anyway. > > >> >> > > >> >> Otherwise, might it make sense to extend the scope of this FLIP? > > >> >> > > >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4758 > > >> >> [2] > https://lists.apache.org/thread/gf0h4gh3xfsj78cpdsxsnj70nhzcmv9r > > >> >> > > >> >> On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 6:04 AM Xintong Song < > tonysong...@gmail.com> > > >> >> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> > +1 > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Best, > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Xintong > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 10:54 AM Wencong Liu < > liuwencle...@163.com > > > > > >> >> wrote: > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Hi devs, > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > I would like to start a discussion on FLIP-347: Remove > > >> >> IOReadableWritable > > >> >> > > serialization in Path [1]. > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > The Path class is currently mutable to support > IOReadableWritable > > >> >> > > serialization. However, many parts > > >> >> > > of the code assume that the Path is immutable. By making the > Path > > >> class > > >> >> > > immutable, we can ensure > > >> >> > > that paths are stored correctly without the possibility of > > mutation > > >> and > > >> >> > > eliminate the occurrence of subtle errors. > > >> >> > > As such I propose to modify the Path class to no longer > implement > > >> the > > >> >> > > IOReadableWritable interface. > > >> >> > > Looking forward to your feedback. > > >> >> > > [1] > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-347%3A+Remove+IOReadableWritable+serialization+in+Path > > >> >> > > Best regards, > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > Wencong Liu > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > >
