-1 (binding) currently: I don't think this should have gone to a vote yet given that Chesnay deliberately mentioned that he would vote against it as-is. The discussion should have been settled first.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:51 AM Zhu Zhu <reed...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Zhu > > Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> 于2023年1月10日周二 17:43写道： > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Best, > > Jark > > > > > 2023年1月10日 12:02，Qingsheng Ren <renqs...@gmail.com> 写道： > > > > > > Thanks for the FLIP! > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Best, > > > Qingsheng > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 10:08 AM Hang Ruan <ruanhang1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> Thanks for all the feedback so far. > > >> Based on the discussion[1], we have come to a consensus, so I would > like to > > >> start a vote on FLIP-274: Introduce metric group for > > >> OperatorCoordinator[2]. > > >> > > >> The vote will last for at least 72 hours (Jan 7th at 11:00 GMT) unless > > >> there is an objection or insufficient votes. > > >> > > >> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/63m9w60rndqnrqvgb6qosvt2bcbww53k > > >> [2] > > >> > > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-274%3A+Introduce+metric+group+for+OperatorCoordinator > > >> > > >> Best, > > >> Hang > > >> > > >
