Hi Andy,

For future threads, it's best to start a separate email with the subject
starting with [VOTE]. I've just created one for awareness, linking back to
this thread.

+1 (binding) for this.

Best regards,

Martijn

Op do 28 jul. 2022 om 09:46 schreef Teoh, Hong <lian...@amazon.co.uk.invalid
>:

> Hi all,
>
> I'd also like to add my non-binding +1 for this FLIP. I think it's a great
> idea to make onboarding easier for new data analysts/engineers, and IMO
> adding more dedicated connectors is a step in the right direction.
>
>
> Regards,
> Hong
>
>
>
> On 27/07/2022, 19:15, "Ryan Skraba" <rskr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>     CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
> not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and
> know the content is safe.
>
>
>
>     Hello!
>
>     I'd like to add my non-binding +1 for this FLIP.
>
>     Full disclosure: as a colleague of Andriy, I sometimes hear the gory
> details of divergence between Elasticsearch and OpenSearch.  Objectively,
> this is a good reason to create independent OpenSearch connectors.
>
>     As a side comment, while Elasticsearch as a trademark and service mark
> never has an internal capital S, OpenSearch always does.
>
>     All my best, Ryan
>
>     On 2022/07/13 20:22:11 Andriy Redko wrote:
>     > Hey Folks,
>     >
>     > Thanks a lot for all the feedback and comments so far. Based on the
> discussion [1],
>     > it seems like there is a genuine interest in supporting OpenSearch
> [2] natively. With
>     > that being said, I would like to start a vote on FLIP-243 [3].
>     >
>     > The vote will last for at least 72 hours unless there is an
> objection or
>     > insufficient votes.
>     >
>     > Thank you!
>     >
>     > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/jls0vqc7jb84jp14j4jok1pqfgo2cl30
>     > [2] https://opensearch.org/
>     > [3]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-243%3A+Dedicated+Opensearch+connectors
>     >
>     > Best Regards,
>     >     Andriy Redko
>     >
>     >
>
>

Reply via email to