Thanks Robert, That's a good idea, let's revisit it later.
Regards, Roman On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 3:40 PM Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks a lot for bringing up this idea Roman! > > After reading the initial proposal, I quite liked the idea, because it > makes our life easier: We can only monitor lists relevant for the topics we > are working on (I have to admit that I usually skip all questions that seem > to be related to SQL or Statefun). > There are a few Apache projects which have followed a similar approach [1], > most notable maybe the Hadoop project, which has a user@, as well as > hdfs-user@, mapreduce-user@, ozone-user@ etc. There, it seems that > sub-projects have separate lists. This would support the idea of splitting > out statefun into a separate list. > > But the majority of people who have commented so far seem to have concerns > regarding the proposal, which seem reasonable. > I propose to revisit this proposal at a later point. > > > > [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ >
