Thanks for the update and for reporting the issue Matthias. I see that FLINK-21030 is now resolved [1] I can confirm that FLINK-21515 is indeed a test stability not affecting production code (I've published a patch to fix it).
Therefore, I will proceed to building the next RC from e9af362f0caa16e75e66aa1403c62666e77f98f0. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21030 Regards, Roman On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 1:43 PM Matthias Pohl <matth...@ververica.com> wrote: > There's a test instability which I assume is caused by FLINK-21028 [1]. I > created FLINK-21515 [2] to cover this issue. > Could somebody verify that? I validated already that this issue appears on > master as well without the changes added in FLINK-21030 [3]. > > Best, > Matthias > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21028 > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21515 > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21030 > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 12:25 PM Matthias Pohl <matth...@ververica.com> > wrote: > >> FYI: I created the PRs for merging FLINK-21030 [1] into release-1.12 [2] >> and release-1.11 [3]. >> >> Best, >> Matthias >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21030 >> [2] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15034 >> [3] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/15035 >> >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 5:18 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> If time allows then we could also include FLINK-21030 [1]. We are about >>> to >>> merge this fix. >>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21030 >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Till >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 4:13 PM Roman Khachatryan <ro...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Hi everyone, >>> > >>> > The issue which caused the previous RC cancellation is now resolved >>> [1]. >>> > >>> > There are two more issues that we'd like to include in 1.12.2 [2][3]. >>> > Yuan and I are going to prepare the next RC (#2) once they are >>> resolved. >>> > >>> > Please let us know if there are any other issues blocking the RC. >>> > Currently, the dashboard doesn't show any blockers [4]. >>> > >>> > >>> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21453 >>> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21490 >>> > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21452 >>> > [4] https://s.apache.org/flink-1.12.2-blockers >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > Roman >>> > >>> > >>> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 5:10 PM Yuan Mei <yuanmei.w...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > > Hey devs, >>> > > >>> > > I'm very glad to announce that all known blocking issues for >>> > release-1.12.2 >>> > > have been resolved. >>> > > >>> > > release-1.12.2 will freeze at: >>> > > commit 1f8be1fd7b2b37a124e4d2b8080d08e259bdf095 >>> > > >>> > > Roman and I are about to prepare the first release candidate and many >>> > > thanks to Roman for agreeing to do the release together with me! >>> > > >>> > > We will start a separate voting thread as soon as RC1 is created. >>> > > >>> > > Best, >>> > > >>> > > Yuan >>> > > >>> > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 2:11 AM Matthias Pohl < >>> matth...@ververica.com> >>> > > wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > I created FLINK-21358 [1] (and a PR [2] for it) which we might >>> want to >>> > > > include in 1.12.2 as well. >>> > > > >>> > > > Best, >>> > > > Matthias >>> > > > >>> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21358 >>> > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14920 >>> > > > >>> > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 1:19 PM Yuan Mei <yuanmei.w...@gmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > >> Thanks very much for your replies! >>> > > >> >>> > > >> I've been reaching out to the owners of the issues/blockers >>> mentioned >>> > > >> above. By now, we have >>> > > >> >>> > > >> Blocker Issues: >>> > > >> >>> > > >> - >>> > > >> >>> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21013: fixed >>> > > >> - >>> > > >> >>> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21030: estimate to >>> > > finish >>> > > >> by the end of this week, but should not be a release blocker >>> > > >> >>> > > >> Best to Include: >>> > > >> >>> > > >> - >>> > > >> >>> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20417: fixed >>> > > >> - >>> > > >> >>> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20663: estimate to >>> > > finish >>> > > >> by the end of this week, but should not be a release blocker >>> > > >> - >>> > > >> >>> > > >> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14848: under review >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> Hence, let's target *a feature freeze on Feb. 15, next Monday*! >>> > > >> >>> > > >> If there is any concern on anything, please feel free to contact >>> me. >>> > > >> >>> > > >> Best >>> > > >> Yuan >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:38 AM Matthias Pohl < >>> matth...@ververica.com> >>> > > >> wrote: >>> > > >> >>> > > >>> Fabian and I were investigating strange behavior with >>> > > stop-with-savepoint >>> > > >>> not terminating when using the new fromSource to add a source to >>> a >>> > job >>> > > >>> definition. I created FLINK-21323 [1] to cover the issue. This >>> might >>> > > not >>> > > >>> be >>> > > >>> a blocker for 1.12.2 since this bug would have been already >>> around >>> > > since >>> > > >>> 1.11, if I'm not mistaken? I wanted to bring this to your >>> attention, >>> > > >>> anyway. It would be good if someone more familiar with this part >>> of >>> > the >>> > > >>> source code could verify our findings and confirm the severity >>> of the >>> > > >>> issue. >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> Best, >>> > > >>> Matthias >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21323 >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 7:25 PM Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> > +1 for the 1.12.2 release >>> > > >>> > >>> > > >>> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 3:20 AM Matthias Pohl < >>> > matth...@ververica.com >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > wrote: >>> > > >>> > >>> > > >>> > > Thanks Yuan for driving 1.12.2. >>> > > >>> > > +1 for releasing 1.12.2 >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > One comment about FLINK-21030 [1]: I hope to fix it this >>> week. >>> > But >>> > > >>> there >>> > > >>> > > are still some uncertainties. The underlying problem is older >>> > than >>> > > >>> 1.12. >>> > > >>> > > Hence, the suggestion is to not block the 1.12.2 release >>> because >>> > of >>> > > >>> > > FLINK-21030 [1]. I will leave it as a blocker issue, though, >>> to >>> > > >>> underline >>> > > >>> > > that it should be fixed for 1.13. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > Best, >>> > > >>> > > Matthias >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21030 >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 4:10 AM Xintong Song < >>> > tonysong...@gmail.com >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > wrote: >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > > Thanks Yuan, >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > > +1 for releasing 1.12.2 and Yuan as the release manager. >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > > Thank you~ >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > > Xintong Song >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > > On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 3:41 PM Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > +1 for releasing 1.12.2, and thanks for volunteering to >>> be >>> > our >>> > > >>> > release >>> > > >>> > > > > manager Yuan. >>> > > >>> > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > Besides the mentioned issues, I could see two more >>> blockers >>> > > with >>> > > >>> > 1.12.2 >>> > > >>> > > > as >>> > > >>> > > > > fix version [1] and need some tracking: >>> > > >>> > > > > * FLINK-21013 < >>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21013 >>> > > >>> > >>> > > >>> > > Blink >>> > > >>> > > > > planner does not ingest timestamp into StreamRecord >>> > > >>> > > > > * FLINK- 21030 <http://Broken job restart for job with >>> > > disjoint >>> > > >>> > graph> >>> > > >>> > > > > Broken >>> > > >>> > > > > job restart for job with disjoint graph >>> > > >>> > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > Best Regards, >>> > > >>> > > > > Yu >>> > > >>> > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > [1] https://s.apache.org/flink-1.12.2-blockers >>> > > >>> > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > On Sat, 6 Feb 2021 at 08:57, Kurt Young < >>> ykt...@gmail.com> >>> > > >>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > Thanks for being our release manager Yuan. >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > We found a out of memory issue [1] which will affect >>> most >>> > > batch >>> > > >>> > jobs >>> > > >>> > > > > thus I >>> > > >>> > > > > > think >>> > > >>> > > > > > it would be great if we can include this fix in 1.12.2. >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20663 >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > Best, >>> > > >>> > > > > > Kurt >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 12:36 AM Till Rohrmann < >>> > > >>> > trohrm...@apache.org> >>> > > >>> > > > > > wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > Thanks for volunteering for being our release manager >>> > Yuan >>> > > >>> :-) >>> > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > +1 for a timely bug fix release. >>> > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > I will try to review the PR for FLINK- 20417 [1] >>> which >>> > is a >>> > > >>> good >>> > > >>> > > fix >>> > > >>> > > > to >>> > > >>> > > > > > > include in the next bug fix release. We don't have to >>> > block >>> > > >>> the >>> > > >>> > > > release >>> > > >>> > > > > > on >>> > > >>> > > > > > > this fix though. >>> > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > [1] >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20417 >>> > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > Cheers, >>> > > >>> > > > > > > Till >>> > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 5:12 PM Piotr Nowojski < >>> > > >>> > > pnowoj...@apache.org> >>> > > >>> > > > > > > wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > Hi, >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > Thanks Yuan for bringing up this topic. >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > +1 for the quick 1.12.2 release. >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > As Yuan mentioned, me and Roman can help whenever >>> > > committer >>> > > >>> > > rights >>> > > >>> > > > > will >>> > > >>> > > > > > > be >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > required. >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > I am a Firefox user and I just fixed a long >>> lasting >>> > bug >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14848 , wish >>> this >>> > > >>> would >>> > > >>> > be >>> > > >>> > > > > merged >>> > > >>> > > > > > > in >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > this release. >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > I will push to speed up review of your PR. Let's >>> try to >>> > > >>> merge >>> > > >>> > it >>> > > >>> > > > > before >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > 1.12.2, but at the same time I wouldn't block the >>> > release >>> > > >>> on >>> > > >>> > this >>> > > >>> > > > > bug. >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > Best, >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > Piotrek >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > pt., 5 lut 2021 o 12:12 郁蓝 < >>> happyhacker...@foxmail.com >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > > napisał(a): >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > Hi Yuan, >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > I am a Firefox user and I just fixed a long >>> lasting >>> > bug >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14848 , >>> wish >>> > this >>> > > >>> would >>> > > >>> > > be >>> > > >>> > > > > > merged >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > in >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > this release. >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > Best wishes >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > 发件人: >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > "dev" >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > < >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > yuanmei.w...@gmail.com>; >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > 发送时间: 2021年2月5日(星期五) 晚上6:36 >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > 收件人: "dev"<dev@flink.apache.org>; >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > 主题: [DISCUSS] Releasing Apache Flink 1.12.2 >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > Hey devs, >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > One of the major issues that have not been >>> resolved >>> > in >>> > > >>> Apache >>> > > >>> > > > Flink >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > 1.12.1 >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > is "unaligned >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > checkpoint recovery may lead to corrupted data >>> > > >>> stream"[1]. >>> > > >>> > > Since >>> > > >>> > > > > the >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > problem is now fixed and >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > it is critical to the users, I would like to kick >>> > off a >>> > > >>> > > > discussion >>> > > >>> > > > > on >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > releasing Flink 1.12.2 that >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > includes unaligned checkpoint fixes. >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > I would like to volunteer myself for managing >>> this >>> > > >>> release. >>> > > >>> > > But I >>> > > >>> > > > > > > noticed >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > that some of the release >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > steps may require committer authorities. Luckily, >>> > Piotr >>> > > >>> and >>> > > >>> > > Roman >>> > > >>> > > > > are >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > very >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > kind to provide help >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > on such steps. >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > Apart from the unaligned checkpoint issue, >>> please let >>> > > us >>> > > >>> know >>> > > >>> > > in >>> > > >>> > > > > this >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > thread if there are any >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > other fixes that we should try to include in this >>> > > >>> version. >>> > > >>> > I'll >>> > > >>> > > > try >>> > > >>> > > > > > to >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > communicate with the issue >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > owners and come up with a time estimation next >>> week. >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > [1] >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20654 >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > Best >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > > Yuan >>> > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > >>> > > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >>> > >>> >> >> > > -- > > Matthias Pohl | Engineer > > Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <https://www.ververica.com/> > > -- > > Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The Apache Flink > Conference > > Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time > > -- > > Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany > > -- > Ververica GmbH > Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B > Managing Directors: Yip Park Tung Jason, Jinwei (Kevin) Zhang, Karl Anton > Wehner >
