Hey devs, I'm very glad to announce that all known blocking issues for release-1.12.2 have been resolved.
release-1.12.2 will freeze at: commit 1f8be1fd7b2b37a124e4d2b8080d08e259bdf095 Roman and I are about to prepare the first release candidate and many thanks to Roman for agreeing to do the release together with me! We will start a separate voting thread as soon as RC1 is created. Best, Yuan On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 2:11 AM Matthias Pohl <matth...@ververica.com> wrote: > I created FLINK-21358 [1] (and a PR [2] for it) which we might want to > include in 1.12.2 as well. > > Best, > Matthias > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21358 > [2] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14920 > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 1:19 PM Yuan Mei <yuanmei.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks very much for your replies! >> >> I've been reaching out to the owners of the issues/blockers mentioned >> above. By now, we have >> >> Blocker Issues: >> >> - >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21013: fixed >> - >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21030: estimate to finish >> by the end of this week, but should not be a release blocker >> >> Best to Include: >> >> - >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20417: fixed >> - >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20663: estimate to finish >> by the end of this week, but should not be a release blocker >> - >> >> https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14848: under review >> >> >> Hence, let's target *a feature freeze on Feb. 15, next Monday*! >> >> If there is any concern on anything, please feel free to contact me. >> >> Best >> Yuan >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:38 AM Matthias Pohl <matth...@ververica.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Fabian and I were investigating strange behavior with stop-with-savepoint >>> not terminating when using the new fromSource to add a source to a job >>> definition. I created FLINK-21323 [1] to cover the issue. This might not >>> be >>> a blocker for 1.12.2 since this bug would have been already around since >>> 1.11, if I'm not mistaken? I wanted to bring this to your attention, >>> anyway. It would be good if someone more familiar with this part of the >>> source code could verify our findings and confirm the severity of the >>> issue. >>> >>> Best, >>> Matthias >>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21323 >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 7:25 PM Thomas Weise <t...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> > +1 for the 1.12.2 release >>> > >>> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 3:20 AM Matthias Pohl <matth...@ververica.com> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> > > Thanks Yuan for driving 1.12.2. >>> > > +1 for releasing 1.12.2 >>> > > >>> > > One comment about FLINK-21030 [1]: I hope to fix it this week. But >>> there >>> > > are still some uncertainties. The underlying problem is older than >>> 1.12. >>> > > Hence, the suggestion is to not block the 1.12.2 release because of >>> > > FLINK-21030 [1]. I will leave it as a blocker issue, though, to >>> underline >>> > > that it should be fixed for 1.13. >>> > > >>> > > Best, >>> > > Matthias >>> > > >>> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21030 >>> > > >>> > > On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 4:10 AM Xintong Song <tonysong...@gmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > Thanks Yuan, >>> > > > >>> > > > +1 for releasing 1.12.2 and Yuan as the release manager. >>> > > > >>> > > > Thank you~ >>> > > > >>> > > > Xintong Song >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 3:41 PM Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > > > +1 for releasing 1.12.2, and thanks for volunteering to be our >>> > release >>> > > > > manager Yuan. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Besides the mentioned issues, I could see two more blockers with >>> > 1.12.2 >>> > > > as >>> > > > > fix version [1] and need some tracking: >>> > > > > * FLINK-21013 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21013 >>> > >>> > > Blink >>> > > > > planner does not ingest timestamp into StreamRecord >>> > > > > * FLINK- 21030 <http://Broken job restart for job with disjoint >>> > graph> >>> > > > > Broken >>> > > > > job restart for job with disjoint graph >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Best Regards, >>> > > > > Yu >>> > > > > >>> > > > > [1] https://s.apache.org/flink-1.12.2-blockers >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > On Sat, 6 Feb 2021 at 08:57, Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > > > > >>> > > > > > Thanks for being our release manager Yuan. >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > We found a out of memory issue [1] which will affect most batch >>> > jobs >>> > > > > thus I >>> > > > > > think >>> > > > > > it would be great if we can include this fix in 1.12.2. >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20663 >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > Best, >>> > > > > > Kurt >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 12:36 AM Till Rohrmann < >>> > trohrm...@apache.org> >>> > > > > > wrote: >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > Thanks for volunteering for being our release manager Yuan >>> :-) >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > +1 for a timely bug fix release. >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > I will try to review the PR for FLINK- 20417 [1] which is a >>> good >>> > > fix >>> > > > to >>> > > > > > > include in the next bug fix release. We don't have to block >>> the >>> > > > release >>> > > > > > on >>> > > > > > > this fix though. >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20417 >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > Cheers, >>> > > > > > > Till >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 5:12 PM Piotr Nowojski < >>> > > pnowoj...@apache.org> >>> > > > > > > wrote: >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > Hi, >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > Thanks Yuan for bringing up this topic. >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > +1 for the quick 1.12.2 release. >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > As Yuan mentioned, me and Roman can help whenever committer >>> > > rights >>> > > > > will >>> > > > > > > be >>> > > > > > > > required. >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > I am a Firefox user and I just fixed a long lasting bug >>> > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14848 , wish this >>> would >>> > be >>> > > > > merged >>> > > > > > > in >>> > > > > > > > this release. >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > I will push to speed up review of your PR. Let's try to >>> merge >>> > it >>> > > > > before >>> > > > > > > > 1.12.2, but at the same time I wouldn't block the release >>> on >>> > this >>> > > > > bug. >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > Best, >>> > > > > > > > Piotrek >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > pt., 5 lut 2021 o 12:12 郁蓝 <happyhacker...@foxmail.com> >>> > > > napisał(a): >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Hi Yuan, >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > I am a Firefox user and I just fixed a long lasting bug >>> > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14848 , wish this >>> would >>> > > be >>> > > > > > merged >>> > > > > > > > in >>> > > > > > > > > this release. >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Best wishes >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ >>> > > > > > > > > 发件人: >>> > > > > > > > > "dev" >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > < >>> > > > > > > > > yuanmei.w...@gmail.com>; >>> > > > > > > > > 发送时间: 2021年2月5日(星期五) 晚上6:36 >>> > > > > > > > > 收件人: "dev"<dev@flink.apache.org>; >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > 主题: [DISCUSS] Releasing Apache Flink 1.12.2 >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Hey devs, >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > One of the major issues that have not been resolved in >>> Apache >>> > > > Flink >>> > > > > > > > 1.12.1 >>> > > > > > > > > is "unaligned >>> > > > > > > > > checkpoint recovery may lead to corrupted data >>> stream"[1]. >>> > > Since >>> > > > > the >>> > > > > > > > > problem is now fixed and >>> > > > > > > > > it is critical to the users, I would like to kick off a >>> > > > discussion >>> > > > > on >>> > > > > > > > > releasing Flink 1.12.2 that >>> > > > > > > > > includes unaligned checkpoint fixes. >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > I would like to volunteer myself for managing this >>> release. >>> > > But I >>> > > > > > > noticed >>> > > > > > > > > that some of the release >>> > > > > > > > > steps may require committer authorities. Luckily, Piotr >>> and >>> > > Roman >>> > > > > are >>> > > > > > > > very >>> > > > > > > > > kind to provide help >>> > > > > > > > > on such steps. >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Apart from the unaligned checkpoint issue, please let us >>> know >>> > > in >>> > > > > this >>> > > > > > > > > thread if there are any >>> > > > > > > > > other fixes that we should try to include in this >>> version. >>> > I'll >>> > > > try >>> > > > > > to >>> > > > > > > > > communicate with the issue >>> > > > > > > > > owners and come up with a time estimation next week. >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20654 >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Best >>> > > > > > > > > Yuan >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > >>> > >> >>
