+1 On 27/01/2021 11:00, Chesnay Schepler wrote: > +1 > > While I don't think the filesystem is really useless, in it's current > state it is not maintainable, and so far no one rose up to remedy this. > > On 1/27/2021 10:57 AM, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: >> +1 >> >> I'm almost always in favour of removing old code instead of >> continuing to let it rot. >> >> Best, >> Aljoscha >> >> On 2021/01/26 14:11, Robert Metzger wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> during a security maintenance PR [1], Chesnay noticed that the >>> flink-swift-fs-hadoop module is lacking test coverage [2]. >>> Also, there hasn't been any substantial change since 2018, when it was >>> introduced. >>> On the user@ ML, I could not find any proof of significant use of the >>> module (no one mentioned any problems with it). >>> >>> *I propose to remove this module in Flink 1.13*. Otherwise, we would >>> release a module with known vulnerable dependencies, and an unknown >>> stability. >>> If there are users, they can still use the 1.12.0 release of it. If we >>> notice that there are a lot of users, we can reintroduce the FS, and >>> add >>> proper tests for it. >>> >>> Please let me know if you have any concerns, otherwise, I'll remove it. >>> >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/14749 >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20804 > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
