+1 Best, Kurt
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 12:25 AM Seth Wiesman <sjwies...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > I would hope this helps attract more early adopters so if there are issues > we can resolve them in time for 1.13. > > Seth > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 5:13 AM Dawid Wysakowicz <dwysakow...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Given that the BATCH execution mode was only released in 1.12 and a > > rather small impact of the suggested change I'd be ok with backporting > > it to 1.12.x. > > > > Best, > > > > Dawid > > > > On 07/01/2021 12:50, Kostas Kloudas wrote: > > > +1 on my side as it does not break anything and it can act as > motivation > > > for some people to upgrade. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Kostas > > > > > > On Thu, 7 Jan 2021, 12:39 Aljoscha Krettek, <aljos...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > >> 1.12.x > > >> Reply-To: > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> what do you think about backporting FLINK-20491 [1] to Flink 1.12.x? > > >> > > >> I (we, including Dawid and Kostas) are a bit torn on this. > > >> > > >> a) It's a limitation of Flink 1.12.0 and fixing this seems very good > for > > >> users that would otherwise have to wait until Flink 1.13.0. > > >> > > >> b) It's technically a new feature. We allow something with this change > > >> where previously an `UnsupportedOperationException` would be thrown. > > >> > > >> I would lean towards backporting this to 1.12.x. Thoughts? > > >> > > >> Best, > > >> Aljoscha > > >> > > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20491 > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
