+1 I would hope this helps attract more early adopters so if there are issues we can resolve them in time for 1.13.
Seth On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 5:13 AM Dawid Wysakowicz <dwysakow...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Given that the BATCH execution mode was only released in 1.12 and a > rather small impact of the suggested change I'd be ok with backporting > it to 1.12.x. > > Best, > > Dawid > > On 07/01/2021 12:50, Kostas Kloudas wrote: > > +1 on my side as it does not break anything and it can act as motivation > > for some people to upgrade. > > > > Cheers, > > Kostas > > > > On Thu, 7 Jan 2021, 12:39 Aljoscha Krettek, <aljos...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> 1.12.x > >> Reply-To: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> what do you think about backporting FLINK-20491 [1] to Flink 1.12.x? > >> > >> I (we, including Dawid and Kostas) are a bit torn on this. > >> > >> a) It's a limitation of Flink 1.12.0 and fixing this seems very good for > >> users that would otherwise have to wait until Flink 1.13.0. > >> > >> b) It's technically a new feature. We allow something with this change > >> where previously an `UnsupportedOperationException` would be thrown. > >> > >> I would lean towards backporting this to 1.12.x. Thoughts? > >> > >> Best, > >> Aljoscha > >> > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20491 > >> > >> > >> > >
