I have to correct the vote result as following:

There were 5 votes, 3 of which are binding:

- Aljoscha Krettek (binding)
- Steven Wu
- Kostas Kloudas (binding)
- Jingsong Li (binding)
- Jiangang Liu

Changes still have been accepted.

Sorry to disturb everyone!

Best,
Guowei


On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 10:11 AM Guowei Ma <guowei....@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> The voting time for FLIP-143 [1] has passed. I'm closing the vote now.
>
> There were 5 votes, 4 of which are binding:
>
> - Aljoscha Krettek (binding)
> - Steven Wu
> - Kostas Kloudas (binding)
> - Jingsong Li (binding)
> - Jiangang Liu (binding)
>
> There were no -1 votes.
>
> Thus, changes have been accepted. I'll update the FLIP doc accordingly.
>
> There is still a discussion about the `CommitResult/GlobaCommitter
> interface, which we could do more discussion at the implementation phase.
>
> Thanks everyone for participating and discussing
>
> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/KEJ4CQ
>
> Best,
> Guowei
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 6:32 PM 刘建刚 <liujiangangp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Best,
>> Liu Jiangang
>>
>> Jingsong Li <jingsongl...@gmail.com> 于2020年9月29日周二 下午1:36写道:
>>
>> > +1 (binding)
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Jingsong
>> >
>> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 3:21 AM Kostas Kloudas <kklou...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1 (binding)
>> > >
>> > > @Steven Wu I think there will be opportunities to fine tune the API
>> > > during the implementation.
>> > >
>> > > Cheers,
>> > > Kostas
>> > >
>> > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 7:56 PM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > +1 (non-binding)
>> > > >
>> > > > Although I would love to continue the discussion for tweaking the
>> > > > CommitResult/GlobaCommitter interface maybe during the
>> implementation
>> > > phase.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 5:35 AM Aljoscha Krettek <
>> aljos...@apache.org>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > +1 (binding)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Aljoscha
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On 25.09.20 14:26, Guowei Ma wrote:
>> > > > > >  From the discussion[1] we could find that FLIP focuses on
>> > providing
>> > > an
>> > > > > > unified transactional sink API. So I updated the FLIP's title to
>> > > "Unified
>> > > > > > Transactional Sink API". But I found that the old link could
>> not be
>> > > > > opened
>> > > > > > again.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I would update the link[2] here. Sorry for the inconvenience.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > [1]
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf09dfeeaf35da5ee98afe559b5a6e955c9f03ade0262727f6b5c4c1e%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
>> > > > > > [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/KEJ4CQ
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Best,
>> > > > > > Guowei
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 8:13 PM Guowei Ma <guowei....@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >> Hi, all
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> After the discussion in [1], I would like to open a voting
>> thread
>> > > for
>> > > > > >> FLIP-143 [2], which proposes a unified sink api.
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> The vote will be open until September 29th (72h + weekend),
>> unless
>> > > there
>> > > > > >> is an objection or not enough votes.
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> [1]
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf09dfeeaf35da5ee98afe559b5a6e955c9f03ade0262727f6b5c4c1e%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
>> > > > > >> [2]
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-143%3A+Unified+Sink+API
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Best,
>> > > > > >> Guowei
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best, Jingsong Lee
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to