+1 (binding) @Steven Wu I think there will be opportunities to fine tune the API during the implementation.
Cheers, Kostas On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 7:56 PM Steven Wu <stevenz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Although I would love to continue the discussion for tweaking the > CommitResult/GlobaCommitter interface maybe during the implementation phase. > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 5:35 AM Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Aljoscha > > > > On 25.09.20 14:26, Guowei Ma wrote: > > > From the discussion[1] we could find that FLIP focuses on providing an > > > unified transactional sink API. So I updated the FLIP's title to "Unified > > > Transactional Sink API". But I found that the old link could not be > > opened > > > again. > > > > > > I would update the link[2] here. Sorry for the inconvenience. > > > > > > [1] > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf09dfeeaf35da5ee98afe559b5a6e955c9f03ade0262727f6b5c4c1e%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > > [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/KEJ4CQ > > > > > > Best, > > > Guowei > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 8:13 PM Guowei Ma <guowei....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, all > > >> > > >> After the discussion in [1], I would like to open a voting thread for > > >> FLIP-143 [2], which proposes a unified sink api. > > >> > > >> The vote will be open until September 29th (72h + weekend), unless there > > >> is an objection or not enough votes. > > >> > > >> [1] > > >> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf09dfeeaf35da5ee98afe559b5a6e955c9f03ade0262727f6b5c4c1e%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > >> [2] > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-143%3A+Unified+Sink+API > > >> > > >> Best, > > >> Guowei > > >> > > > > > > >
