That makes sense. We are using 2.12 for our production Also, for flink scala 2.12 support, it is in fact limited to scala 2.12.7. It is binary incompatible with version 2.12 above ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12461 ) That would be great to at least move to a more recent 2.12 version, and ideally to 2.13.
Is there any scala support plan available? Matthieu On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 5:00 PM Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote: > Yes! I would be in favour of this since it's blocking us from upgrading > certain dependencies. > > I would also be in favour of dropping Scala completely but that's a > different story. > > Aljoscha > > On 10.09.20 16:51, Seth Wiesman wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > > > Think of this as a pre-flip, but what does everyone think about dropping > > Scala 2.11 support from Flink. > > > > The last patch release was in 2017 and in that time the scala community > has > > released 2.13 and is working towards a 3.0 release. Apache Kafka and > Spark > > have both dropped 2.11 support in recent versions. In fact, Flink's > > universal Kafka connector is stuck on 2.4 because that is the last > version > > with scala 2.11 support. > > > > What are people's thoughts on dropping Scala 2.11? How many are still > using > > it in production? > > > > Seth > > > > -- Matthieu Bonneviot Senior R&D Engineer, DataDome M +33 7 68 29 79 34 <+33+7+68+29+79+34> E matthieu.bonnev...@datadome.co <matthieu.bonnev...@datadome.co> W www.datadome.co <http://www.datadome.co?utm_source=WiseStamp&utm_medium=email&utm_term=&utm_content=&utm_campaign=signature> [image: facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/datadome/?utm_source=WiseStamp&utm_medium=email&utm_term=&utm_content=&utm_campaign=signature> [image: linkedin] <https://fr.linkedin.com/company/datadome?utm_source=WiseStamp&utm_medium=email&utm_term=&utm_content=&utm_campaign=signature> [image: twitter] <https://twitter.com/data_dome?utm_source=WiseStamp&utm_medium=email&utm_term=&utm_content=&utm_campaign=signature>
