@David Anderson <da...@alpinegizmo.com> I think we can get that into 1.12. I have a branch that just needs to be cleaned up.
+1 for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13095 On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 2:03 AM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Rodrigo, > > FLINK-10407 has not been up to date with the actual progress on the > feature. We will update it soon. > > I think that the community won't actively work on FLINK-12002 in this > release. However, we will work on FLINK-16430 [1] and once this is done > continue with the clean up of the legacy scheduler code paths. > > As for the scope of the 1.12 release, we hope to finish FLINK-16430 and > make considerable progress with FLINK-10407. However, I don't think that > FLINK-10407 will be fully functional yet. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16430 > > Cheers, > Till > > On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 6:43 PM rodrigobrochado < > rodrigo.broch...@predito.com.br> wrote: > > > Thanks Dian! > > > > About the wiki page, I think that the "Reactive-scaling mode" by Till has > > an > > open issue on FLINK-10407 [1]. > > > > Still about scaling, what about the adaptive parallelism of jobs [2]? > This > > is somehow related to Prasanna and Harold's comments above. It seems to > > depend on finishing the old "Redesign Flink Scheduling" [3], FLIP-119 > > (already on wiki list), and FLINK-15626 (Remove of legacy scheduler) [4]. > > Would they be achievable until 1.12? > > > > If I could add one more, the python UDF in docker mode would be awesome > > [5]. > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10407 > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12002 > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10429 > > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15626 > > [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14025 > > > > Thanks, > > Rodrigo > > > > > > > > -- > > Sent from: > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/ > > >
