Hi Rodrigo, FLINK-10407 has not been up to date with the actual progress on the feature. We will update it soon.
I think that the community won't actively work on FLINK-12002 in this release. However, we will work on FLINK-16430 [1] and once this is done continue with the clean up of the legacy scheduler code paths. As for the scope of the 1.12 release, we hope to finish FLINK-16430 and make considerable progress with FLINK-10407. However, I don't think that FLINK-10407 will be fully functional yet. [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16430 Cheers, Till On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 6:43 PM rodrigobrochado < rodrigo.broch...@predito.com.br> wrote: > Thanks Dian! > > About the wiki page, I think that the "Reactive-scaling mode" by Till has > an > open issue on FLINK-10407 [1]. > > Still about scaling, what about the adaptive parallelism of jobs [2]? This > is somehow related to Prasanna and Harold's comments above. It seems to > depend on finishing the old "Redesign Flink Scheduling" [3], FLIP-119 > (already on wiki list), and FLINK-15626 (Remove of legacy scheduler) [4]. > Would they be achievable until 1.12? > > If I could add one more, the python UDF in docker mode would be awesome > [5]. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10407 > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12002 > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10429 > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-15626 > [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-14025 > > Thanks, > Rodrigo > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/ >
