This vote thread is cancelled.

Please refer to the new RC5:
http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-Flink-Stateful-Functions-Release-2-0-0-release-candidate-5-td39648.html
.

On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 4:39 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Thanks for all the efforts on checking the licenses.
>
> It seems that we're now on a good state to start a new RC with the various
> license fixes.
> Will post the RC5 vote thread shortly after.
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 4:30 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> @Yu - there is nothing magic behind the license check, but I can share
>> what
>> I did there.
>>
>> Source distribution:
>>   - This means code copied into the repo.
>>   - The Java source code is usually fine, committers copying code verbatim
>> usually comment on that directly.
>>   - Most important are other files, like docs (mostly build setup, not
>> contents files), other html/web related code (like UIs), build files, etc.
>> So specifically go through these files (there are usually not too many).
>>
>> Binary distribution:
>>   - To check the compatibility of licenses of transitive dependencies,
>> maven generated a "DEPENDENCIES" file in the Jar that lists the
>> dependencies by license, which is a very helpful start
>>   - Packaging wise, projects that build shaded jars are important, because
>> they bundle dependencies, which means
>>      (a) checking that the relevant licenses / notices are present
>>      (b) checking that they don't bundle too much (jar tf <jar file> |
>> grep
>> ... | less) because transitive dependencies and mixing compile / provided
>> is not straightforward in maven.
>>
>> Best,
>> Stephan
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 4:47 AM Yu Li <car...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Stephan,
>> >
>> > Could you also share the method of license check, so more people could
>> > help in future votes? And maybe adding some instructions into our wiki
>> [1]?
>> > I skipped the licensing check in my vote because not aware of a good
>> way to
>> > do it thoroughly, not sure whether I'm the only one having such question
>> > though. Thanks.
>> >
>> > btw, I noticed the fix version of FLINK-16891-16897 are all set to 2.0.0
>> > but I guess it should be statefun-2.0.0 instead?
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Yu
>> >
>> > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Licensing
>> >
>> > On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 04:01, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I did a release check for license issues - all in all, we need a new
>> RC.
>> >>
>> >> The only blocker I found was the missing jquery license file.
>> >>
>> >> Another somewhat critical thing is that "statefun-flink-distribution"
>> >> bundles many unwanted dependencies.
>> >>   - Because the shading merges the notice files, this is not a legal
>> >> issue.
>> >>   - Because Flinks inverted classloading still uses "parent-first" for
>> all
>> >> "org.apache.flink.*" classes, this does not break the system
>> >> But it is unwanted behavior and makes the artifacts unnecessarily
>> large.
>> >>
>> >> I opened FLINK-16891 - FLINK-16897 for the issues I found.
>> >> All issues are fixed in this PR:
>> >> https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/pull/85
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:17 PM Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > I have found a few things, am preparing a joint PR to fix them.
>> >> >
>> >> > So far, only the missing jquery license would have been a release
>> >> blocker.
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:24 PM Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org
>> >
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> The jquery license is in fact missing from the master/release-1.10
>> >> >> branches. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16888
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 31/03/2020 12:18, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>> >> >> > For Kafka we traditionally exclude the NOTICE file since as far
>> as we
>> >> >> > can tell it is misleading anyway, see the
>> flink-sql-connector-kafka
>> >> >> > modules.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > @Robert for the Flink project the jquery license is in the source
>> at
>> >> >> > licenses/LICENSE.jquery
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I'm a bit concerned just how many licensing issues are showing up
>> in
>> >> >> > these RCs. I would suggest to do a proper scan of the licensing
>> >> before
>> >> >> > opening another RC.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > And yes, the missing MIT license is grounds for cancellation,
>> hence,
>> >> -1.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On 31/03/2020 11:56, Robert Metzger wrote:
>> >> >> >> Thanks a lot Gordon!
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Checked:
>> >> >> >> - files in the staging repository seem to be ok (no unexpected
>> >> files,
>> >> >> >> versions set correctly, quickstart archetype looks ok)
>> >> >> >> - statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator-2.0.0.jar (and
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> /org/apache/flink/statefun-flink-distribution/2.0.0/statefun-flink-distribution-2.0.0.jar)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> contains a NOTICE file in the root which seems to come from
>> Apache
>> >> >> >> Kafka.
>> >> >> >> The file states
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> This distribution has a binary dependency on jersey, which is
>> >> >> available
>> >> >> >>> under the CDDL
>> >> >> >>> License. The source code of jersey can be found at
>> >> >> >>> https://github.com/jersey/jersey/.
>> >> >> >> This text is not mentioned in our NOTICE file (which is located
>> in
>> >> >> >> META-INF/NOTICE).
>> >> >> >> I'm not a lawyer, but the NOTICE file situation might be
>> confusing
>> >> in
>> >> >> >> that
>> >> >> >> jar. The first NOTICE file you see is from Kafka. If we argue
>> that
>> >> >> >> this is
>> >> >> >> not the right file,
>> >> >> >> because that one is located in META-INF/NOTICE, then we might be
>> at
>> >> >> >> risk of
>> >> >> >> not having properly forwarded Kafka's NOTICE file.
>> >> >> >> I believe this is okay, as we somehow include all the necessary
>> >> >> >> information, but we should address this in the next release (or
>> if
>> >> >> >> this RC
>> >> >> >> gets cancelled again).
>> >> >> >> I'm also curious to hear the opinion of others on this.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> - The source release contains "docs/page/js/jquery.min.js",
>> which is
>> >> >> MIT
>> >> >> >> licensed. The MIT license requires us to ship a copy of the
>> license
>> >> >> with
>> >> >> >> each copy of the source.
>> >> >> >> apache/flink also has this file:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/docs/page/js/jquery.min.js
>> ,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >> but
>> >> >> >> it ships the jquery license in the "licenses/" folder (even
>> though
>> >> this
>> >> >> >> file is not in git, I guess it's added during release
>> generation?!)
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I believe we have to cancel this RC because of the missing
>> license
>> >> >> >> file in
>> >> >> >> the source distribution? I'm not voting on this RC, in case I
>> have
>> >> >> >> overlooked something and we can continue.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 9:31 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
>> >> >> >> <tzuli...@apache.org>
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>> ======= NOTICE =======
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> For your testing, please continue to use this staging area for
>> the
>> >> >> >>> Maven
>> >> >> >>> artifacts:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1344/
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> The only difference between this staging repo and the original
>> repo
>> >> >> >>> posted
>> >> >> >>> in this thread (
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/)
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> is that a few unintended source release distributions have been
>> >> >> removed
>> >> >> >>> from the Maven repo staging area.
>> >> >> >>> Those should not be built and published by Maven, since we use
>> our
>> >> own
>> >> >> >>> tools to build the source distributions (staged at
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/
>> >> ).
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> Since this does not affect any code in the project, and the
>> staged
>> >> >> >>> Maven
>> >> >> >>> artifacts are still built with the same commit hash as the
>> source
>> >> >> >>> distribution,
>> >> >> >>> this RC vote will continue to run until the original vote end
>> time.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> All previous votes in this thread will still be accounted for.
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:57 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai
>> >> >> >>> <tzuli...@apache.org>
>> >> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>> Sounds good, I'll post a new link to this vote thread, which
>> will
>> >> >> have
>> >> >> >>> the
>> >> >> >>>> problem fixed in a new maven staging repository.
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:51 PM Robert Metzger <
>> >> rmetz...@apache.org>
>> >> >> >>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> Thank you for looking into this.
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> I'm fine with keeping this RC open, but re-vote on a new maven
>> >> >> >>>>> staging
>> >> >> >>>>> repository.
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:42 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> >> >> >>> tzuli...@apache.org>
>> >> >> >>>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> Found the culprit:
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> The Stateful Functions project uses the Apache POM as the
>> parent
>> >> >> >>>>>> POM,
>> >> >> >>>>> and
>> >> >> >>>>>> uses the `apache-release` build profile to build the staging
>> >> jars.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> The problem arises because the `apache-release` build profile
>> >> >> itself
>> >> >> >>>>>> bundles a source release distribution to be released to
>> Maven.
>> >> >> >>>>>> This should be disabled specifically for us, because we use
>> our
>> >> own
>> >> >> >>>>> tooling
>> >> >> >>>>>> (tools/releasing/create_source_release.sh) to create the
>> source
>> >> >> >>> tarballs
>> >> >> >>>>>> which does correctly exclude all those unexpected files
>> Robert
>> >> >> >>>>>> found.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> Will rebuild the RC. I think in this case, it's completely
>> fine
>> >> to
>> >> >> >>> keep
>> >> >> >>>>>> with the original voting end time, since nothing is really
>> >> touched,
>> >> >> >>> only
>> >> >> >>>>>> excluding some files from the staging Maven repository.
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:29 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> >> >> >>>>> tzuli...@apache.org>
>> >> >> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>> Hi Robert,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>> I think you're right. There should be no tarballs / jars
>> >> packaged
>> >> >> >>> for
>> >> >> >>>>>>> statefun-parent actually, only the pom file since that's the
>> >> >> parent
>> >> >> >>>>>> module
>> >> >> >>>>>>> which only has pom packaging.
>> >> >> >>>>>>> I'm looking into it.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 2:23 PM Robert Metzger <
>> >> >> rmetz...@apache.org
>> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> While checking the release, I found a 77
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> MB statefun-parent-2.0.0-source-release.zip file in the
>> maven
>> >> >> >>> staging
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> repo:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/org/apache/flink/statefun-parent/2.0.0/
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> It seems that the file contains all ruby dependencies in
>> docs/
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> from
>> >> >> >>>>>> jekyll
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> for the docs (in
>> >> >> >>> "statefun-parent-2.0.0/docs/.rubydeps/ruby/2.5.0").
>> >> >> >>>>> I
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> don't think we want to publish these files as part of the
>> >> release
>> >> >> >>> to
>> >> >> >>>>>> maven
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> central?
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> (It also contains python venv files in
>> >> >> "statefun-python-sdk/venv")
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> I guess this is a reason to cancel the RC?
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:10 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> >> >> >>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> ** Legal **
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - checksums and GPG files match corresponding release
>> files
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Source distribution does not contain binaries, contents
>> are
>> >> >> >>> sane
>> >> >> >>>>> (no
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> .git* / .travis* / generated html content files)
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Bundled source LICENSEs and NOTICE looks good. Mentions
>> >> >> bundled
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> font-awesome dependency in docs and copied sources from
>> >> fastutil
>> >> >> >>> (
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> http://fastutil.di.unimi.it/)
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Bundled LICENSEs and NOTICE files for Maven artifacts
>> looks
>> >> >> >>> good.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Artifacts that do bundle dependencies are:
>> >> >> >>>>>> statefun-flink-distribution,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> statefun-ridesharing-example-simulator,
>> statefun-flink-core
>> >> >> >>> (copied
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> sources).
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Python SDK distributions (source and wheel) contain
>> ASLv2
>> >> >> >>> LICENSE
>> >> >> >>>>>> and
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> NOTICE files (no bundled dependencies)
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - All POMs / README / Python SDK setup.py / Dockerfiles /
>> doc
>> >> >> >>>>> configs
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> point
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> to same version “2.0.0”
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - README looks good
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> ** Functional **
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Building from source dist with end-to-end tests enabled
>> >> (mvn
>> >> >> >>>>> clean
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> verify
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> -Prun-e2e-tests) passes (JDK 8)
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Generated quickstart from archetype looks good (correct
>> >> POM /
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Dockerfile
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> / service file)
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Examples run: Java Greeter / Java Ridesharing / Python
>> >> Greeter
>> >> >> >>> /
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Python
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> SDK Walkthrough
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Flink Harness works in IDE
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> - Test remote functions deployment mode with AWS
>> ecosystem:
>> >> >> >>> remote
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Python
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS Lambda behind AWS API Gateway,
>> Java
>> >> >> >>>>> embedded
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> functions running in AWS ECS
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:09 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> FYI - I've also updated the website Downloads page to
>> >> include
>> >> >> >>>>> this
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> release.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Please also consider that for your reviews:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/318
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:42 AM Konstantin Knauf <
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> konstan...@ververica.com>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gordon,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Maven build from source...check
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Python build from source...check
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> * Went through Walkthrough based on local builds...check
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 5:52 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on the *release candidate #4*
>> for
>> >> the
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> version
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> 2.0.0
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> of Apache Flink Stateful Functions,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> as follows:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
>> >> specific
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> comments)
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Testing Guideline**
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> You can find here [1] a doc that we can use for
>> >> >> >>> collaborating
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> testing
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> efforts.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The listed testing tasks in the doc also serve as a
>> >> >> >>> guideline
>> >> >> >>>>> in
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> what
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> to
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> test for this release.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you wish to take ownership of a testing task, simply
>> >> put
>> >> >> >>>>> your
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> name
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> down
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> in the "Checked by" field of the task.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Release Overview**
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> As an overview, the release consists of the following:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> a) Stateful Functions canonical source distribution,
>> to be
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> deployed to
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> release repository at dist.apache.org
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> b) Stateful Functions Python SDK distributions to be
>> >> >> >>> deployed
>> >> >> >>>>> to
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> PyPI
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> c) Maven artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
>> >> >> >>>>> Repository
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Staging Areas to Review**
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The staging areas containing the above mentioned
>> artifacts
>> >> >> >>>>> are as
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> follows,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> for your review:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for a) and b) can be found in the
>> >> >> >>>>> corresponding
>> >> >> >>>>>> dev
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> repository at dist.apache.org [2]
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * All artifacts for c) can be found at the Apache Nexus
>> >> >> >>>>>> Repository
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> [3]
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> All artifacts are singed with the
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> key 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A [4]
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Other links for your review:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [5]
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag "release-2.0.0-rc4" [6] [7]
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Extra Remarks**
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Part of the release is also official Docker images
>> for
>> >> >> >>>>> Stateful
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Functions. This can be a separate process, since the
>> >> >> >>> creation
>> >> >> >>>>> of
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> those
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> relies on the fact that we have distribution jars
>> already
>> >> >> >>>>>> deployed
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> to
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maven. I will follow-up with this after these artifacts
>> >> are
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> officially
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> released.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime, there is this discussion [8] ongoing
>> >> about
>> >> >> >>>>> where
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> to
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> host
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> the StateFun Dockerfiles.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * The Flink Website and blog post is also being worked
>> on
>> >> >> >>> (by
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Marta)
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> as
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> part of the release, to incorporate the new Stateful
>> >> >> >>> Functions
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> project.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> We
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> can follow up with a link to those changes afterwards
>> in
>> >> >> >>> this
>> >> >> >>>>>> vote
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> thread,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> but that would not block you to test and cast your
>> votes
>> >> >> >>>>> already.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> * Since the Flink website changes are still being
>> worked
>> >> on,
>> >> >> >>>>> you
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> will
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> not
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> yet be able to find the Stateful Functions docs from
>> >> there.
>> >> >> >>>>> Here
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> are
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> the
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> links [9] [10].
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> **Vote Duration**
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Since this RC only fixes licensing issues from previous
>> >> RCs,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> and the code itself has not been touched,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to stick with the original vote ending time.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours starting
>> >> Monday
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> *(target end date is Wednesday, April 1st).*
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
>> >> >> >>>>>> affirmative
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P9yjwSbPQtul0z2AXMnVolWQbzhxs68suJvzR6xMjcs/edit?usp=sharing
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-statefun-2.0.0-rc4/
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [5]
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12346878
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [6]
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink-statefun.git;a=commit;h=5d5d62fca2dbe3c75e8157b7ce67d4d4ce12ffd9
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [7]
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> https://github.com/apache/flink-statefun/tree/release-2.0.0-rc4
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [8]
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Creating-a-new-repo-to-host-Stateful-Functions-Dockerfiles-td39342.html
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [9]
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>
>> >> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-master/
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> [10]
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>
>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-statefun-docs-release-2.0/
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> TIP: You can create a `settings.xml` file with these
>> >> >> >>> contents:
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> """
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <settings>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>    <activeProfiles>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <activeProfile>flink-statefun-2.0.0</activeProfile>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>    </activeProfiles>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>    <profiles>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>      <profile>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>        <repositories>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>          <repository>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> <id>flink-statefun-2.0.0</id>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>            <url>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>          </repository>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>          <repository>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>            <id>archetype</id>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>            <url>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1343/
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </url>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>          </repository>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>        </repositories>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>      </profile>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>    </profiles>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> </settings>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> """
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> And reference that in you maven commands via
>> `--settings
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> path/to/settings.xml`.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> This is useful for creating a quickstart based on the
>> >> staged
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> release
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>> and
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> for building against the staged jars.
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Konstantin Knauf | Head of Product
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> +49 160 91394525
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <
>> >> >> >>> https://www.ververica.com/>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The
>> >> Apache
>> >> >> >>>>> Flink
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Conference
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin,
>> >> Germany
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Ververica GmbH
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip Park
>> >> Tung
>> >> >> >>>>>> Jason,
>> >> >> >>>>>>>> Ji
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> (Tony) Cheng
>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to