+1 (non-binding) No more maintenance work for us Patrick! Just kidding :), it was mostly done by Patrick, all kudos to him. Just one question, we will be able to still be featured as an official docker image in this case?
Best, Ismaël ps. Hope having an official Helm chart becomes also a future target. On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:26 PM Fabian Hueske <fhue...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 > > Am Di., 28. Jan. 2020 um 15:23 Uhr schrieb Yun Tang <myas...@live.com>: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > ________________________________ > > From: Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 21:36 > > To: dev <dev@flink.apache.org>; patr...@ververica.com < > > patr...@ververica.com> > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Integrate Flink Docker image publication into Flink > > release process > > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:20 PM Patrick Lucas <patr...@ververica.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Thanks for kicking this off, Ufuk. > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > -- > > > Patrick > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:50 PM Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > there is a proposal to contribute the Dockerfiles and scripts of > > > > https://github.com/docker-flink/docker-flink to the Flink project. > The > > > > discussion corresponding to this vote outlines the reasoning for the > > > > proposal and can be found here: [1]. > > > > > > > > The proposal is as follows: > > > > * Request a new repository apache/flink-docker > > > > * Migrate all files from docker-flink/docker-flink to > > apache/flink-docker > > > > * Update the release documentation to describe how to update > > > > apache/flink-docker for new releases > > > > > > > > Please review and vote on this proposal as follows: > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the proposal > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the proposal (please provide specific > comments) > > > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 3 days, ending the earliest on: > > > January > > > > 30th 2020, 17:00 UTC. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Ufuk > > > > > > > > PS: I'm treating this proposal similar to a "Release Plan" as > mentioned > > > in > > > > the project bylaws [2]. Please let me know if you consider this a > > > different > > > > category. > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Integrate-Flink-Docker-image-publication-into-Flink-release-process-td36139.html > > > > [2] > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120731026 > > > > > > > > > >
