@uce Agreed. The discussion here seems to have died down. Since I assume most people following this thread have gone home for the day, I'll leave this for one more day and then remove the pages tomorrow.
Seth On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 9:38 AM Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > Answers inline... > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 6:28 PM Seth Wiesman <sjwies...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > One option would be to do exactly that, but then I feel like we are > > committing to tracking changes on those systems and I just don't know how > > feasible that is. > > > > I don't think that's feasible. It's bound to get out of sync. > > > > I am personally still in favor of the removal of all three but as a > > compromise, we could replace these pages with a "Vendor" page that just > > links to the appropriate docs for these services. It could also include > the > > most basic Filesystem information that @ufuk mentioned. That still leaves > > an open question of who we allow. Just the cloud providers or also others > > like Cloudera and Ververica? For AWS only EMR or also Kinesis Data > > Analytics, etc. > > > > Judging from Robert's numbers, I'm happy to drop these pages as well now. > > Since there is no objection to remove those pages (and we wouldn't recycle > any content anyways for anything going forward), I suggest to continue with > the removal and keep the discussion of a new vendor page separate. > > – Ufuk >
