+1 (non-binding) Jepsen test suite passed 10 times consecutively
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 5:31 PM Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 > > I did some testing on a Google Cloud Dataproc cluster (it gives you a > managed YARN and Google Cloud Storage (GCS)): > - tried both YARN session mode and YARN per-job mode, also using > bin/flink list/cancel/etc. against a YARN session cluster > - ran examples that write to GCS, both with the native Hadoop FileSystem > and a custom “plugin” FileSystem > - ran stateful streaming jobs that use GCS as a checkpoint backend > - tried running SQL programs on YARN using the SQL Cli: this worked for > YARN session mode but not for YARN per-job mode. Looking at the code I > don’t think per-job mode would work from seeing how it is implemented. But > I think it’s an OK restriction to have for now > - in all the testing I had fine-grained recovery (region failover) > enabled but I didn’t simulate any failures > > > On 14. Aug 2019, at 15:20, Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for preparing this release candidate. I have verified the > following: > > > > - verified the checksums and GPG files match the corresponding release > files > > - verified that the source archives do not contains any binaries > > - build the source release with Scala 2.11 successfully. > > - ran `mvn verify` locally, met 2 issuses [FLINK-13687] and > [FLINK-13688], > > but > > both are not release blockers. Other than that, all tests are passed. > > - ran all e2e tests which don't need download external packages (it's > very > > unstable > > in China and almost impossible to download them), all passed. > > - started local cluster, ran some examples. Met a small website display > > issue > > [FLINK-13591], which is also not a release blocker. > > > > Although we have pushed some fixes around blink planner and hive > > integration > > after RC2, but consider these are both preview features, I'm lean to be > ok > > to release > > without these fixes. > > > > +1 from my side. (binding) > > > > Best, > > Kurt > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 5:13 PM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi Gordon, > >> > >> I have verified the following things: > >> > >> - build the source release with Scala 2.12 and Scala 2.11 successfully > >> - checked/verified signatures and hashes > >> - checked that all POM files point to the same version > >> - ran some flink table related end-to-end tests locally and succeeded > >> (except TPC-H e2e failed which is reported in FLINK-13704) > >> - started cluster for both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, ran examples, verified > web > >> ui and log output, nothing unexpected > >> - started cluster, ran a SQL query to temporal join with kafka source > and > >> mysql jdbc table, and write results to kafka again. Using DDL to create > the > >> source and sinks. looks good. > >> - reviewed the release PR > >> > >> As FLINK-13704 is not recognized as blocker issue, so +1 from my side > >> (non-binding). > >> > >> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 17:07, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Richard, > >>> > >>> although I can see that it would be handy for users who have PubSub set > >> up, > >>> I would rather not include examples which require an external > dependency > >>> into the Flink distribution. I think examples should be self-contained. > >> My > >>> concern is that we would bloat the distribution for many users at the > >>> benefit of a few. Instead, I think it would be better to make these > >>> examples available differently, maybe through Flink's ecosystem website > >> or > >>> maybe a new examples section in Flink's documentation. > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> Till > >>> > >>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:43 AM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi Till, > >>>> > >>>> After thinking about we can use VARCHAR as an alternative of > >>>> timestamp/time/date. > >>>> I'm fine with not recognize it as a blocker issue. > >>>> We can fix it into 1.9.1. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Jark > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 15:10, Richard Deurwaarder <rich...@xeli.eu> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hello all, > >>>>> > >>>>> I noticed the PubSub example jar is not included in the examples/ dir > >>> of > >>>>> flink-dist. I've created > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13700 > >>>>> + https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9424/files to fix this. > >>>>> > >>>>> I will leave it up to you to decide if we want to add this to 1.9.0. > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards, > >>>>> > >>>>> Richard > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:04 AM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hi Jark, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> thanks for reporting this issue. Could this be a documented > >>> limitation > >>>> of > >>>>>> Blink's preview version? I think we have agreed that the Blink SQL > >>>>> planner > >>>>>> will be rather a preview feature than production ready. Hence it > >>> could > >>>>>> still contain some bugs. My concern is that there might be still > >>> other > >>>>>> issues which we'll discover bit by bit and could postpone the > >> release > >>>>> even > >>>>>> further if we say Blink bugs are blockers. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>> Till > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 7:42 AM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I just find an issue when testing connector DDLs against blink > >>>> planner > >>>>>> for > >>>>>>> rc2. > >>>>>>> This issue lead to the DDL doesn't work when containing > >>>>>> timestamp/date/time > >>>>>>> type. > >>>>>>> I have created an issue FLINK-13699[1] and a pull request for > >> this. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> IMO, this can be a blocker issue of 1.9 release. Because > >>>>>>> timestamp/date/time are primitive types, and this will break the > >>> DDL > >>>>>>> feature. > >>>>>>> However, I want to hear more thoughts from the community whether > >> we > >>>>>> should > >>>>>>> recognize it as a blocker. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> Jark > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13699 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 22:46, Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks Gordon, will do that. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:42 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai < > >>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Concerning FLINK-13231: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Since this is a @PublicEvolving interface, technically it is > >> ok > >>>> to > >>>>>>> break > >>>>>>>>> it across releases (including across bugfix releases?). > >>>>>>>>> So, @Becket if you do merge it now, please mark the fix > >> version > >>>> as > >>>>>>> 1.9.1. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> During the voting process, in the case a new RC is created, > >> we > >>>>>> usually > >>>>>>>>> check the list of changes compared to the previous RC, and > >>>> correct > >>>>>> the > >>>>>>>> "Fix > >>>>>>>>> Version" of the corresponding JIRAs to be the right version > >> (in > >>>> the > >>>>>>> case, > >>>>>>>>> it would be corrected to 1.9.0 instead of 1.9.1). > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:25 PM Till Rohrmann < > >>>>> trohrm...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I agree that it would be nicer. Not sure whether we should > >>>> cancel > >>>>>> the > >>>>>>> RC > >>>>>>>>>> for this issue given that it is open for quite some time and > >>>>> hasn't > >>>>>>> been > >>>>>>>>>> addressed until very recently. Maybe we could include it on > >>> the > >>>>>>>> shortlist > >>>>>>>>>> of nice-to-do things which we do in case that the RC gets > >>>>> cancelled. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>>> Till > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:18 PM Becket Qin < > >>>> becket....@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Till, > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I think we have already documented in that way. So > >>>>> technically > >>>>>>>>>>> speaking it is fine to change it later. It is just better > >> if > >>> we > >>>>>> could > >>>>>>>>>>> avoid > >>>>>>>>>>> doing that. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:09 PM Till Rohrmann < > >>>>>> trohrm...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Could we say that the PubSub connector is public evolving > >>>>>> instead? > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>>>>> Till > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 3:18 PM Becket Qin < > >>>>> becket....@gmail.com > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-13231(palindrome!) has a minor Google PubSub > >>>> connector > >>>>>> API > >>>>>>>>>>> change > >>>>>>>>>>>>> regarding how to config rate limiting. The GCP PubSub > >>>>> connector > >>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>>>>> newly > >>>>>>>>>>>>> introduced connector in 1.9, so it would be nice to > >>> include > >>>>>> this > >>>>>>>>>>> change > >>>>>>>>>>>>> into 1.9 rather than later to avoid a public API > >> change. > >>> I > >>>> am > >>>>>>>>>>> thinking of > >>>>>>>>>>>>> making this as a blocker for 1.9. Want to check what do > >>>>> others > >>>>>>>> think. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:04 PM Zili Chen < > >>>>>> wander4...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Kurt, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your explanation. For [1] I think at least > >>> we > >>>>>> should > >>>>>>>>>>> change > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the JIRA issue field, like unset the fixed version. > >> For > >>>>> [2] I > >>>>>>> can > >>>>>>>>>>> see > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the change is all in test scope but wonder if such a > >>>> commit > >>>>>>> still > >>>>>>>>>>>> invalid > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the release candidate. IIRC previous RC VOTE threads > >>>> would > >>>>>>>> contain > >>>>>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release manual/guide, I will try to look up it, too. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tison. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月12日周一 > >> 下午5:42写道： > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Zili, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the heads up. The 2 issues you mentioned > >>>> were > >>>>>>> opened > >>>>>>>>>>> by > >>>>>>>>>>>> me. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> We > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found the reason of the second issue and a PR was > >>>> opened > >>>>>> for > >>>>>>>> it. > >>>>>>>>>>> As > >>>>>>>>>>>>> said > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jira, the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue was just a testing problem, should not be > >>> blocker > >>>>> of > >>>>>>>> 1.9.0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>> release. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we will still merge it into 1.9 branch. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kurt > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:38 PM Zili Chen < > >>>>>>>> wander4...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just noticed that a few hours ago there were > >> two > >>>> new > >>>>>>> issues > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> filed and marked as blockers to 1.9.0[1][2]. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now [1] is closed as duplication but still marked > >>> as > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a blocker to 1.9.0, while [2] is downgrade to > >>> "Major" > >>>>>>>> priority > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but still target to be fixed in 1.9.0. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It would be worth to have attention of our > >> release > >>>>>> manager > >>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>> least. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tison. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13687 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13688 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月12日周一 > >>>>>> 下午5:10写道： > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Stephan :) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That looks easy enough, will try! > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:00 AM Stephan Ewen < > >>>>>>>>>>> se...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gyula! > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for reporting this. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you try to simply build Flink without > >>> Hadoop > >>>>> and > >>>>>>> then > >>>>>>>>>>>>> exporting > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> HADOOP_CLASSPATH to your CloudEra libs? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is the recommended way these days. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stephan > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:48 AM Gyula Fóra < > >>>>>>>>>>>>> gyula.f...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Dawid, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the meantime I also figured out that I > >>> need > >>>> to > >>>>>>> build > >>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded > >>> project > >>>>>>> locally > >>>>>>>>>>> with > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Dhadoop.version set to the specific hadoop > >>>>> version > >>>>>>> if > >>>>>>>> I > >>>>>>>>>>> want > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:54 AM Dawid > >>>> Wysakowicz > >>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dwysakow...@apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Gyula, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As for the issues with mapr maven > >>> repository, > >>>>> you > >>>>>>>> might > >>>>>>>>>>>> have > >>>>>>>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this message: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77f4db930216e6da0d6121065149cef43ff3ea33c9ffe9b1a3047210@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Try using the "unsafe-mapr-repo" profile. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dawid > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 11/08/2019 19:31, Gyula Fóra wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi again, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How do I build the RC locally with the > >>>> hadoop > >>>>>>>> version > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specified? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no matter what I do I run into > >> dependency > >>>>>>> problems > >>>>>>>>>>> with > >>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shaded > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hadoop > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This seems to have worked in the past. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There might be some documentation > >>> somewhere > >>>>>> that > >>>>>>> I > >>>>>>>>>>>> couldnt > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate any pointers :) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 6:57 PM Gyula > >>> Fóra > >>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gyula.f...@gmail.com > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi! > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am trying to build 1.9.0-rc2 with > >> the > >>>>>>>>>>> -Pvendor-repos > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> profile > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enabled. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get the following error: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mvn clean install -DskipTests > >>>> -Pvendor-repos > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Pinclude-hadoop (ignore that the > >> hadoop > >>>>>> version > >>>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>>>> not > >>>>>>>>>>>> a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vendor > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hadoop > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on > >>> project > >>>>>>>>>>>> flink-hadoop-fs: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> resolve dependencies for project > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>> org.apache.flink:flink-hadoop-fs:jar:1.9.0: > >>>>>>> Failed > >>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> collect > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > >>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Failed > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> read > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> artifact descriptor for > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Could > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transfer > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> artifact > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:pom:2.6.0-7.0 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from/to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mapr-releases ( > >>>>>>> https://repository.mapr.com/maven/ > >>>>>>>> ): > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: > >>>>>> PKIX > >>>>>>>> path > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> building > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> failed: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>> sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unable > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valid certification path to requested > >>>> target > >>>>>> -> > >>>>>>>>>>> [Help 1] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This looks like a TLS error. Might not > >>> be > >>>>>>> related > >>>>>>>>>>> to the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could be good to know. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:26 PM Tzu-Li > >>>>> (Gordon) > >>>>>>>> Tai < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please note that the unresolved > >> issues > >>>> that > >>>>>> are > >>>>>>>>>>> still > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tagged > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with a > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fix > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version "1.9.0", as seen in the JIRA > >>>>> release > >>>>>>>> notes > >>>>>>>>>>> [1], > >>>>>>>>>>>>> are > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update documents for new features. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've left them still associated with > >>>> 1.9.0 > >>>>>>> since > >>>>>>>>>>> these > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> should > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updated for 1.9.0 soon along with the > >>>>>> official > >>>>>>>>>>> release. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:17 PM Tzu-Li > >>>>>> (Gordon) > >>>>>>>> Tai > >>>>>>>>>>> < > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tzuli...@apache.org> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release candidate #2 for Apache > >> Flink > >>>>> 1.9.0 > >>>>>> is > >>>>>>>> now > >>>>>>>>>>>> ready > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> review. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the first voting candidate > >> for > >>>>>> 1.9.0, > >>>>>>>>>>>> following > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> preview > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidates RC0 and RC1. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please review and vote on release > >>>>> candidate > >>>>>> #2 > >>>>>>>> for > >>>>>>>>>>>>> version > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.9.0, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> follows: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release > >>>> (please > >>>>>>>> provide > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> specific > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comments) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The complete staging area is > >> available > >>>> for > >>>>>>> your > >>>>>>>>>>>> review, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> includes: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * JIRA release notes [1], > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * the official Apache source release > >>> and > >>>>>>> binary > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> convenience > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], > >>> which > >>>>> are > >>>>>>>> signed > >>>>>>>>>>>> with > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> key > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fingerprint > >>>>>>>>>>> 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [3], > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to > >> the > >>>>> Maven > >>>>>>>>>>> Central > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Repository > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4], > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * source code tag > >> “release-1.9.0-rc2” > >>>> [5]. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Robert is also preparing a pull > >>> request > >>>>> for > >>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> announcement > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blog > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> post > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the works, and will update this > >> voting > >>>>>> thread > >>>>>>>>>>> with a > >>>>>>>>>>>>> link > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pull > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> request shortly afterwards. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for *at least > >> 72 > >>>>>> hours*. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please cast your votes before *Aug. > >>> 14th > >>>>>>> (Wed.) > >>>>>>>>>>> 2019, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 17:00 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PM > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CET*.It > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adopted by majority approval, with > >> at > >>>>> least > >>>>>> 3 > >>>>>>>> PMC > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> affirmative > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gordon[1] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/ > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] > >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >
