Hi, Thanks for preparing this release candidate. I have verified the following:
- verified the checksums and GPG files match the corresponding release files - verified that the source archives do not contains any binaries - build the source release with Scala 2.11 successfully. - ran `mvn verify` locally, met 2 issuses [FLINK-13687] and [FLINK-13688], but both are not release blockers. Other than that, all tests are passed. - ran all e2e tests which don't need download external packages (it's very unstable in China and almost impossible to download them), all passed. - started local cluster, ran some examples. Met a small website display issue [FLINK-13591], which is also not a release blocker. Although we have pushed some fixes around blink planner and hive integration after RC2, but consider these are both preview features, I'm lean to be ok to release without these fixes. +1 from my side. (binding) Best, Kurt On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 5:13 PM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Gordon, > > I have verified the following things: > > - build the source release with Scala 2.12 and Scala 2.11 successfully > - checked/verified signatures and hashes > - checked that all POM files point to the same version > - ran some flink table related end-to-end tests locally and succeeded > (except TPC-H e2e failed which is reported in FLINK-13704) > - started cluster for both Scala 2.11 and 2.12, ran examples, verified web > ui and log output, nothing unexpected > - started cluster, ran a SQL query to temporal join with kafka source and > mysql jdbc table, and write results to kafka again. Using DDL to create the > source and sinks. looks good. > - reviewed the release PR > > As FLINK-13704 is not recognized as blocker issue, so +1 from my side > (non-binding). > > On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 17:07, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi Richard, > > > > although I can see that it would be handy for users who have PubSub set > up, > > I would rather not include examples which require an external dependency > > into the Flink distribution. I think examples should be self-contained. > My > > concern is that we would bloat the distribution for many users at the > > benefit of a few. Instead, I think it would be better to make these > > examples available differently, maybe through Flink's ecosystem website > or > > maybe a new examples section in Flink's documentation. > > > > Cheers, > > Till > > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:43 AM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Till, > > > > > > After thinking about we can use VARCHAR as an alternative of > > > timestamp/time/date. > > > I'm fine with not recognize it as a blocker issue. > > > We can fix it into 1.9.1. > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Jark > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 at 15:10, Richard Deurwaarder <rich...@xeli.eu> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > I noticed the PubSub example jar is not included in the examples/ dir > > of > > > > flink-dist. I've created > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13700 > > > > + https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/9424/files to fix this. > > > > > > > > I will leave it up to you to decide if we want to add this to 1.9.0. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:04 AM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Jark, > > > > > > > > > > thanks for reporting this issue. Could this be a documented > > limitation > > > of > > > > > Blink's preview version? I think we have agreed that the Blink SQL > > > > planner > > > > > will be rather a preview feature than production ready. Hence it > > could > > > > > still contain some bugs. My concern is that there might be still > > other > > > > > issues which we'll discover bit by bit and could postpone the > release > > > > even > > > > > further if we say Blink bugs are blockers. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Till > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 7:42 AM Jark Wu <imj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > I just find an issue when testing connector DDLs against blink > > > planner > > > > > for > > > > > > rc2. > > > > > > This issue lead to the DDL doesn't work when containing > > > > > timestamp/date/time > > > > > > type. > > > > > > I have created an issue FLINK-13699[1] and a pull request for > this. > > > > > > > > > > > > IMO, this can be a blocker issue of 1.9 release. Because > > > > > > timestamp/date/time are primitive types, and this will break the > > DDL > > > > > > feature. > > > > > > However, I want to hear more thoughts from the community whether > we > > > > > should > > > > > > recognize it as a blocker. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Jark > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13699 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 22:46, Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks Gordon, will do that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:42 PM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai < > > > > > tzuli...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Concerning FLINK-13231: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since this is a @PublicEvolving interface, technically it is > ok > > > to > > > > > > break > > > > > > > > it across releases (including across bugfix releases?). > > > > > > > > So, @Becket if you do merge it now, please mark the fix > version > > > as > > > > > > 1.9.1. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > During the voting process, in the case a new RC is created, > we > > > > > usually > > > > > > > > check the list of changes compared to the previous RC, and > > > correct > > > > > the > > > > > > > "Fix > > > > > > > > Version" of the corresponding JIRAs to be the right version > (in > > > the > > > > > > case, > > > > > > > > it would be corrected to 1.9.0 instead of 1.9.1). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:25 PM Till Rohrmann < > > > > trohrm...@apache.org> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I agree that it would be nicer. Not sure whether we should > > > cancel > > > > > the > > > > > > RC > > > > > > > >> for this issue given that it is open for quite some time and > > > > hasn't > > > > > > been > > > > > > > >> addressed until very recently. Maybe we could include it on > > the > > > > > > > shortlist > > > > > > > >> of nice-to-do things which we do in case that the RC gets > > > > cancelled. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Cheers, > > > > > > > >> Till > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:18 PM Becket Qin < > > > becket....@gmail.com> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>> Hi Till, > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> Yes, I think we have already documented in that way. So > > > > technically > > > > > > > >>> speaking it is fine to change it later. It is just better > if > > we > > > > > could > > > > > > > >>> avoid > > > > > > > >>> doing that. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> Thanks, > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:09 PM Till Rohrmann < > > > > > trohrm...@apache.org> > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > Could we say that the PubSub connector is public evolving > > > > > instead? > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > Cheers, > > > > > > > >>> > Till > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 3:18 PM Becket Qin < > > > > becket....@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > Hi all, > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > FLINK-13231(palindrome!) has a minor Google PubSub > > > connector > > > > > API > > > > > > > >>> change > > > > > > > >>> > > regarding how to config rate limiting. The GCP PubSub > > > > connector > > > > > > is > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > >>> > newly > > > > > > > >>> > > introduced connector in 1.9, so it would be nice to > > include > > > > > this > > > > > > > >>> change > > > > > > > >>> > > into 1.9 rather than later to avoid a public API > change. > > I > > > am > > > > > > > >>> thinking of > > > > > > > >>> > > making this as a blocker for 1.9. Want to check what do > > > > others > > > > > > > think. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Thanks, > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Jiangjie (Becket) Qin > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 2:04 PM Zili Chen < > > > > > wander4...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > Hi Kurt, > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > Thanks for your explanation. For [1] I think at least > > we > > > > > should > > > > > > > >>> change > > > > > > > >>> > > > the JIRA issue field, like unset the fixed version. > For > > > > [2] I > > > > > > can > > > > > > > >>> see > > > > > > > >>> > > > the change is all in test scope but wonder if such a > > > commit > > > > > > still > > > > > > > >>> > invalid > > > > > > > >>> > > > the release candidate. IIRC previous RC VOTE threads > > > would > > > > > > > contain > > > > > > > >>> a > > > > > > > >>> > > > release manual/guide, I will try to look up it, too. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > Best, > > > > > > > >>> > > > tison. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > Kurt Young <ykt...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月12日周一 > 下午5:42写道： > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > Hi Zili, > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > Thanks for the heads up. The 2 issues you mentioned > > > were > > > > > > opened > > > > > > > >>> by > > > > > > > >>> > me. > > > > > > > >>> > > We > > > > > > > >>> > > > > have > > > > > > > >>> > > > > found the reason of the second issue and a PR was > > > opened > > > > > for > > > > > > > it. > > > > > > > >>> As > > > > > > > >>> > > said > > > > > > > >>> > > > in > > > > > > > >>> > > > > jira, the > > > > > > > >>> > > > > issue was just a testing problem, should not be > > blocker > > > > of > > > > > > > 1.9.0 > > > > > > > >>> > > release. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > However, > > > > > > > >>> > > > > we will still merge it into 1.9 branch. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > Best, > > > > > > > >>> > > > > Kurt > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 5:38 PM Zili Chen < > > > > > > > wander4...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > >>> > > wrote: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > I just noticed that a few hours ago there were > two > > > new > > > > > > issues > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > filed and marked as blockers to 1.9.0[1][2]. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Now [1] is closed as duplication but still marked > > as > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > a blocker to 1.9.0, while [2] is downgrade to > > "Major" > > > > > > > priority > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > but still target to be fixed in 1.9.0. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > It would be worth to have attention of our > release > > > > > manager > > > > > > at > > > > > > > >>> > least. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > tison. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > [1] > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13687 > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > [2] > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-13688 > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> 于2019年8月12日周一 > > > > > 下午5:10写道： > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > Thanks Stephan :) > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > That looks easy enough, will try! > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > Gyula > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:00 AM Stephan Ewen < > > > > > > > >>> se...@apache.org> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > Hi Gyula! > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > Thanks for reporting this. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > Can you try to simply build Flink without > > Hadoop > > > > and > > > > > > then > > > > > > > >>> > > exporting > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > HADOOP_CLASSPATH to your CloudEra libs? > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > That is the recommended way these days. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > Stephan > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:48 AM Gyula Fóra < > > > > > > > >>> > > gyula.f...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Thanks Dawid, > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > In the meantime I also figured out that I > > need > > > to > > > > > > build > > > > > > > >>> the > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded > > project > > > > > > locally > > > > > > > >>> with > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > -Dhadoop.version set to the specific hadoop > > > > version > > > > > > if > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > >>> want > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > something > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > different. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > Gyula > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:54 AM Dawid > > > Wysakowicz > > > > < > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > dwysakow...@apache.org > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > Hi Gyula, > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > As for the issues with mapr maven > > repository, > > > > you > > > > > > > might > > > > > > > >>> > have > > > > > > > >>> > > a > > > > > > > >>> > > > > look > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > at > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > this message: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/77f4db930216e6da0d6121065149cef43ff3ea33c9ffe9b1a3047210@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > Try using the "unsafe-mapr-repo" profile. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > Dawid > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > On 11/08/2019 19:31, Gyula Fóra wrote: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Hi again, > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > How do I build the RC locally with the > > > hadoop > > > > > > > version > > > > > > > >>> > > > > specified? > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > Seems > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > like > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > no matter what I do I run into > dependency > > > > > > problems > > > > > > > >>> with > > > > > > > >>> > the > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > shaded > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > hadoop > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > dependencies. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > This seems to have worked in the past. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > There might be some documentation > > somewhere > > > > > that > > > > > > I > > > > > > > >>> > couldnt > > > > > > > >>> > > > > find, > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > so I > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > would > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > appreciate any pointers :) > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > Gyula > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 6:57 PM Gyula > > Fóra > > > < > > > > > > > >>> > > > > gyula.f...@gmail.com > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> Hi! > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> I am trying to build 1.9.0-rc2 with > the > > > > > > > >>> -Pvendor-repos > > > > > > > >>> > > > profile > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > enabled. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> get the following error: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> mvn clean install -DskipTests > > > -Pvendor-repos > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > -Dhadoop.version=2.6.0 > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> -Pinclude-hadoop (ignore that the > hadoop > > > > > version > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > >>> not > > > > > > > >>> > a > > > > > > > >>> > > > > vendor > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > hadoop > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> version) > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on > > project > > > > > > > >>> > flink-hadoop-fs: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > Could > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > not > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> resolve dependencies for project > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > org.apache.flink:flink-hadoop-fs:jar:1.9.0: > > > > > > Failed > > > > > > > >>> to > > > > > > > >>> > > > collect > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > dependencies > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> at > > > > > > > >>> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > Failed > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > to > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > read > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> artifact descriptor for > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>> org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:jar:2.6.0-7.0: > > > > > > > >>> > > Could > > > > > > > >>> > > > > not > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > transfer > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> artifact > > > > > > > >>> > > > org.apache.flink:flink-shaded-hadoop-2:pom:2.6.0-7.0 > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > from/to > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> mapr-releases ( > > > > > > https://repository.mapr.com/maven/ > > > > > > > ): > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: > > > > > PKIX > > > > > > > path > > > > > > > >>> > > > building > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > failed: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > unable > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > find > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> valid certification path to requested > > > target > > > > > -> > > > > > > > >>> [Help 1] > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> This looks like a TLS error. Might not > > be > > > > > > related > > > > > > > >>> to the > > > > > > > >>> > > > > release > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > but > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> could be good to know. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> Cheers, > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> Gyula > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:26 PM Tzu-Li > > > > (Gordon) > > > > > > > Tai < > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > tzuli...@apache.org > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> Please note that the unresolved > issues > > > that > > > > > are > > > > > > > >>> still > > > > > > > >>> > > > tagged > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > with a > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > fix > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> version "1.9.0", as seen in the JIRA > > > > release > > > > > > > notes > > > > > > > >>> [1], > > > > > > > >>> > > are > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > issues > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> update documents for new features. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> I've left them still associated with > > > 1.9.0 > > > > > > since > > > > > > > >>> these > > > > > > > >>> > > > should > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > still > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> updated for 1.9.0 soon along with the > > > > > official > > > > > > > >>> release. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> [1] > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601 > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 6:17 PM Tzu-Li > > > > > (Gordon) > > > > > > > Tai > > > > > > > >>> < > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > tzuli...@apache.org> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Hi all, > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Release candidate #2 for Apache > Flink > > > > 1.9.0 > > > > > is > > > > > > > now > > > > > > > >>> > ready > > > > > > > >>> > > > for > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > your > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> review. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> This is the first voting candidate > for > > > > > 1.9.0, > > > > > > > >>> > following > > > > > > > >>> > > > the > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > preview > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> candidates RC0 and RC1. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Please review and vote on release > > > > candidate > > > > > #2 > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > >>> > > version > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > 1.9.0, > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > as > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> follows: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [ ] +1, Approve the release > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve the release > > > (please > > > > > > > provide > > > > > > > >>> > > > specific > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > comments) > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> The complete staging area is > available > > > for > > > > > > your > > > > > > > >>> > review, > > > > > > > >>> > > > > which > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > includes: > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> * JIRA release notes [1], > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> * the official Apache source release > > and > > > > > > binary > > > > > > > >>> > > > convenience > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > releases > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> be > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> deployed to dist.apache.org [2], > > which > > > > are > > > > > > > signed > > > > > > > >>> > with > > > > > > > >>> > > > the > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > key > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> fingerprint > > > > > > > >>> 1C1E2394D3194E1944613488F320986D35C33D6A > > > > > > > >>> > > [3], > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> * all artifacts to be deployed to > the > > > > Maven > > > > > > > >>> Central > > > > > > > >>> > > > > Repository > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > [4], > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> * source code tag > “release-1.9.0-rc2” > > > [5]. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Robert is also preparing a pull > > request > > > > for > > > > > > the > > > > > > > >>> > > > announcement > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > blog > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > post > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> in > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> the works, and will update this > voting > > > > > thread > > > > > > > >>> with a > > > > > > > >>> > > link > > > > > > > >>> > > > to > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > the > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > pull > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> request shortly afterwards. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> The vote will be open for *at least > 72 > > > > > hours*. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Please cast your votes before *Aug. > > 14th > > > > > > (Wed.) > > > > > > > >>> 2019, > > > > > > > >>> > > > 17:00 > > > > > > > >>> > > > > PM > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > CET*.It > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> is > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> adopted by majority approval, with > at > > > > least > > > > > 3 > > > > > > > PMC > > > > > > > >>> > > > > affirmative > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > votes. > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks, > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> Gordon[1] > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12344601 > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [2] > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-1.9.0-rc2/ > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [3] > > > > > > > >>> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [4] > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1234 > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> [5] > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flink.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/release-1.9.0-rc2 > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
