> I think it’s best to keep this initial implementation focused and add those 
> changes if there is adoption and interest in the community.
I agree. I didn’t mean to hold the implementation/acceptance of this until 
someone solve the SQL story :) 

Piotrek

> On 31 May 2019, at 13:18, Seth Wiesman <sjwies...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> And I can definitely imagine a “savepoint catalog” at some point in the 
> future.
> 
> Seth 
> 
>> On May 31, 2019, at 4:39 AM, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> @Piotr
>> Yes, we're aiming this for the 1.9 release. This was also mentioned in the
>> recent 1.9 feature discussion thread [1].
>> 
>> [1]
>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Features-for-Apache-Flink-1-9-0-td28701.html
>> 
>>> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 4:34 PM Piotr Nowojski <pi...@ververica.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I was long awaiting this feature! I can not help much with reviewing, but
>>> big +1 from my side :)
>>> 
>>> One thing that would be great for analyzing the state and possible smaller
>>> modifications, would be to hook this in with Flink SQL :) Especially if it
>>> could be done in a way that would work out of the box with minimal or no
>>> configuration required, like just opening SQL CLI with just maybe a pointer
>>> to savepoint id?
>>> 
>>> Side question, are you aiming with this for 1.9 release? 1.10? Or you do
>>> not have a specific time frame? I’m asking since users are quite frequently
>>> asking for this and it would be good to know what to answer them.
>>> 
>>> Piotrek
>>> 
>>>> On 29 May 2019, at 17:51, Seth Wiesman <sjwies...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hey Everyone!
>>>> 
>>>> Gordon and I have been discussing adding a savepoint connector to flink
>>> for reading, writing, and modifying savepoints.
>>>> 
>>>> This is useful for:
>>>> * Analyzing state for interesting patterns
>>>> * Troubleshooting or auditing jobs by checking for discrepancies in state
>>>> * Bootstrapping state for new applications
>>>> * Modifying savepoints to make breaking scheme changes or correct
>>> invalid state
>>>> 
>>>> We are looking forwards to your feedback!
>>>> 
>>>> This is the FLIP:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-43%3A+Savepoint+Connector
>>>> 
>>>> Seth
>>> 
>>> 

Reply via email to