Hey, are we doing a feature freeze today? On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 9:52 AM Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai <tzuli...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Robert, > > Regarding FLINK-10776 - Update migration tests for Flink 1.7: > There's still one last test class that needs to be migrated (progress > reflected in the list of subtasks of FLINK-10776), and we definitely should > still fix that before releasing 1.8.0 to ensure backwards compatibility of > savepoints. > > However, I don't think it should block the upcoming feature freeze, as it > is test extension which can be resolved as part of the testing phase. > > Cheers, > Gordon > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 4:44 PM Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > I'm not involved enough with the development to say whether end of this > > week is a realistic deadline. > > But I see that it makes sense to release 1.8 soon, if it is blocking the > > Table API refactoring. > > > > There are 5 blockers assigned to the 1.8.0 release: > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20FLINK%20AND%20priority%20%3D%20Blocker%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.8.0%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC > > > > > > These are the issues and my thoughts: > > > > - FLINK-11537 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11537> | > > ExecutionGraph does not reach terminal state when JobMaster lost > leadership > > | --> We should address this before the release! > > - FLINK-11121 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11121> | > Check > > and update licensing notes for Aliyun FS [FLINK-10865] | --> We should > > address this before the release! > > - FLINK-11249 | FlinkKafkaProducer011 can not be migrated to > > FlinkKafkaProducer | --> According to the latest comment on the PR, it > > seems that there is agreement to not include the fix into the 1.8 > release. > > I propose to remove the JIRA from the 1.8 release > > - FLINK-11541 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11541> | > Heavy > > deployment E2E test failed on Travis | --> This issue has not been > > analyzed. > > - FLINK-10776 | Update migration tests for Flink 1.7 | --> @Gordon What's > > the status here? > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 8:46 AM Hequn Cheng <chenghe...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Thanks for planning on the 1.8 release. +1 for cutting the release > branch > > > soon. > > > > > > As Stephan and Jincheng said, the refactoring of Table API may block > the > > > release. Fortunately, some issues have already been merged into the > > master, > > > for example, deprecate methods in TableEnvironment and Table. And some > > > others are under review, so hopefully, we can cut the branch on Feb 22. > > > Hoping to have a chance to help on the 1.8 release. :-) > > > > > > Best, Hequn > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 5:11 PM jincheng sun <sunjincheng...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks for bring up the discuss of 1.8 release Aljoscha ! > > > > > > > > +1 for feature freeze for 1.8 release soon. > > > > > > > > As Stephan mentioned above, Table API refactoring work is blocked on > a > > > > release. > > > > The expects changes of deprecated(in 1.8) APIs (Such as: > > > > ExternalCatalogTable#builder(), new Table(..) ) in the TableAPI > > > refactoring > > > > work has been merged into the Master. So from the points of my > view, I > > > > hope cutting of the 1.8 release branch ASAP. :-) > > > > > > > > Of course, I agree that we shouldn’t rush things. > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Jincheng > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> 于2019年2月13日周三 上午2:00写道： > > > > > > > > > +1 for doing a 1.8 release soon. > > > > > > > > > > Some of the Table API refactoring work is blocked on a release > > > (assuming > > > > we > > > > > want one release to deprecate some functions before dropping them. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 11:03 AM Aljoscha Krettek < > > aljos...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > > > > > In reference to a recent mail by Ufuk [1] and because it has > been a > > > > while > > > > > > since the last Flink release we should start thinking about a > Flink > > > 1.8 > > > > > > release. We’re actually a bit behind the cadence but I think we > > still > > > > > > shouldn’t rush things. I’m hereby proposing myself as release > > manager > > > > for > > > > > > Flink 1.8 and I also want to suggest February 22 as the date for > > > > feature > > > > > > freeze and cutting of the 1.8 release branch. This is quite soon > > but > > > > > still > > > > > > gives us two weeks to work on things. > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > Aljoscha > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/423164e045c3c206f2b8d5c061be7055ef4bc3fd880c28a862ef5d8c@%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
