On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote: > For example even if the question about changed dependencies is answered > with "no", the reviewer still has to check that.
But having it as a required option/text in the PR descriptions helps reviewers to actually remember to check that. I think we should be more realistic here and assume that reviewers will also overlook things etc. To me, keeping the questions is more important than the intro text. Therefore, I would be OK with moving the text to the contrib guide, but I would definitely keep the detailed yes/nos and not go with high level questions that everyone will answer differently. – Ufuk
