If there are no objections, I will contact Infra to change the GitHub JIRA notifications as follows:
Jira comments section - initial PR description - comments of the main GitHub thread Jira Work Log - all diff comments On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote: >> Will work log updates still lead to notifications on the mailing list? > > I don't know but it is most likely configurable. I would prefer if we > didn't get notifications for work log items because these would again > be duplicates of the GitHub notifications. > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Neelesh Salian <nsal...@cloudera.com> wrote: >> Thanks Max for coordinating the effort. >> +1 as well. >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 6:57 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> I didn't know that we can put the comments into the work log. >>> Will work log updates still lead to notifications on the mailing list? >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:52 AM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > From what I understand so far, the message mirroring can be adjusted >>> > in the follow parts: >>> > >>> > 1) GitHub PR description >>> > 2) GitHub Diff comments >>> > 3) GitHub Main thread comments >>> > >>> > We can choose to put these as >>> > >>> > 1) The full GitHub comment >>> > 2) Only supply a link to the GitHub comment >>> > >>> > Next, we can store all posts to JIRA >>> > >>> > 1) In the JIRA main comments >>> > 2) In the Work Log >>> > >>> > >>> > I think it would be a nice setup to have the GitHub PR description and >>> > comments directly in the JIRA comments. Diff comments should go in the >>> > Work Log. >>> > >>> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> >>> > wrote: >>> > > Sure, I've filed a JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/ >>> > jira/browse/INFRA-12456 >>> > > >>> > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> > >> @max - can you contact infra about that? >>> > >> >>> > >> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> >>> > wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >>> Actually that is a good suggestion. I know from other Apache projects >>> > >>> that they only mirror the initial description of the pull request but >>> > >>> not the discussion. I agree with you that it's very hard to have >>> > >>> meaningful discussion in JIRA if it is overlapped with GitHub >>> > >>> comments. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Cheers, >>> > >>> Max >>> > >>> >>> > >>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 10:52 PM, Neelesh Salian < >>> nsal...@cloudera.com >>> > > >>> > >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hello, >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > I have noticed there is a high verbosity coming from the PR into >>> the >>> > JIRA >>> > >>> > which makes it hard to focus on the message or the content of the >>> PR >>> > >>> > through the JIRA itself. >>> > >>> > Has there been a discussion over minimizing the details displayed >>> > back on >>> > >>> > the PR's JIRA? >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Maybe just add the PR link and the description of the changes >>> rather >>> > than >>> > >>> > the entire template? >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Any thoughts? >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > >>> > Neelesh Srinivas Salian >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Neelesh Srinivas Salian >> Customer Operations Engineer
