Why would you need to rewrite the TypeInformation in Scala? I think we need a way to replace Serializer implementations anyway unless the generated serializers are compatible to the current ones.
2016-04-20 15:53 GMT+02:00 Gábor Horváth <xazax....@gmail.com>: > Hi Fabian, > > I agree that it would be awesome to move this to its own module/plugin. > However in order to be able to write the code generation in Scala I would > need to rewrite the type information to use Scala as well. I think I will > not > have time to do this during the summer, so I think I will stick to Java and > this modularization can be done later. > > Thanks, > Gábor > > On 19 April 2016 at 11:50, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Gabor, > > > > you are right, a codegen serializer module would depend on flink-core and > > in the current design flink-core would need to know about the type infos > / > > serializers / comparators. > > > > Decoupling implementations of type info, serializers, and comparators > from > > flink-core and resolving the cyclic dependency would be what the plugin > > architecture would be for. > > Maybe this can be done by some mechanism to dynamically load > > TypeInformations for types with overridden serializers / comparators. > > This would require some design document and discussion in the community. > > > > Cheers, Fabian > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-04-18 21:19 GMT+02:00 Gábor Horváth <xazax....@gmail.com>: > > > > > Unfortunately making code generation a separate module would introduce > > > cyclic dependency. > > > Code generation requires the TypeInfo which is available in flink-core > > and > > > flink-core requires > > > the generated serializers from the code generation module. Do you have > a > > > solution for this? > > > > > > I think if we can come up with a solution I will implement it as a > > separate > > > Scala module > > > otherwise I will stick to Java. > > > > > > BR, > > > Gábor > > > > > > On 18 April 2016 at 12:40, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > +1 for not mixing Java and Scala in flink-core. > > > > > > > > Maybe it makes sense to implement the code generated serializers / > > > > comparators as a separate module which can be plugged-in. This could > be > > > > pure Scala. > > > > In general, I think it would be good to have some kind of "version > > > > management" for serializers in place. With features such as > safepoints > > > that > > > > depend on the implementation of serializers, it would be good to > have a > > > > mechanism to switch between implementations. > > > > > > > > Best, Fabian > > > > > > > > 2016-04-18 10:01 GMT+02:00 Chiwan Park <chiwanp...@apache.org>: > > > > > > > > > Yes, I know Janino is a pure Java project. I meant if we add Scala > > code > > > > to > > > > > flink-core, we should add Scala dependency to flink-core and it > could > > > be > > > > > confusing. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Chiwan Park > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 18, 2016, at 2:49 PM, Márton Balassi < > > > balassi.mar...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Chiwan, just to clarify Janino is a Java project. [1] > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/aunkrig/janino > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:40 AM, Chiwan Park < > > chiwanp...@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> I prefer to avoid Scala dependencies in flink-core. If > flink-core > > > > > includes > > > > > >> Scala dependencies, Scala version suffix (_2.10 or _2.11) should > > be > > > > > added. > > > > > >> I think that users could be confused. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Regards, > > > > > >> Chiwan Park > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> On Apr 17, 2016, at 3:49 PM, Márton Balassi < > > > > balassi.mar...@gmail.com> > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Hi Gábor, > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> I think that adding the Janino dep to flink-core should be > fine, > > as > > > > it > > > > > >> has > > > > > >>> quite slim dependencies [1,2] which are generally orthogonal to > > > > Flink's > > > > > >>> main dependency line (also it is already used elsewhere). > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> As for mixing Scala code that is used from the Java parts of > the > > > same > > > > > >> maven > > > > > >>> module I am skeptical. We have seen IDE compilation issues with > > > > > projects > > > > > >>> using this setup and have decided that the community-wide > > potential > > > > IDE > > > > > >>> setup pain outweighs the individual implementation convenience > > with > > > > > >> Scala. > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> [1] > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/codehaus/janino/janino-parent/2.7.8/janino-parent-2.7.8.pom > > > > > >>> [2] > > > > > >>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/codehaus/janino/janino/2.7.8/janino-2.7.8.pom > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Gábor Horváth < > > > xazax....@gmail.com> > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>> Hi! > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Table API already uses code generation and the Janino compiler > > > [1]. > > > > Is > > > > > >> it a > > > > > >>>> dependency that is ok to add to flink-core? In case it is ok, > I > > > > think > > > > > I > > > > > >>>> will use the same in order to be consistent with the other > code > > > > > >> generation > > > > > >>>> efforts. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> I started to look at the Table API code generation [2] and it > > uses > > > > > Scala > > > > > >>>> extensively. There are several Scala features that can make > Java > > > > code > > > > > >>>> generation easier such as pattern matching and string > > > > interpolation. I > > > > > >> did > > > > > >>>> not see any Scala code in flink-core yet. Is it ok to > implement > > > the > > > > > code > > > > > >>>> generation inside the flink-core using Scala? > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Regards, > > > > > >>>> Gábor > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> [1] http://unkrig.de/w/Janino > > > > > >>>> [2] > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/api/table/codegen/CodeGenerator.scala > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> On 18 March 2016 at 19:37, Gábor Horváth <xazax....@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> Thank you! I finalized the project. > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> On 18 March 2016 at 10:29, Márton Balassi < > > > > balassi.mar...@gmail.com> > > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks Gábor, now I also see it on the internal GSoC > > interface. > > > I > > > > > have > > > > > >>>>>> indicated that I wish to mentor your project, I think you > can > > > hit > > > > > >>>> finalize > > > > > >>>>>> on your project there. > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Gábor Horváth < > > > > > xazax....@gmail.com> > > > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> Hi, > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> I have updated this draft to include preliminary > benchmarks, > > > > > >> mentioned > > > > > >>>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>> interaction of annotations with savepoints, extended it > with > > a > > > > > >>>> timeline, > > > > > >>>>>>> and some notes about scala case classes. > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> Regards, > > > > > >>>>>>> Gábor > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> On 9 March 2016 at 16:12, Gábor Horváth < > xazax....@gmail.com > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Hi! > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> As far as I can see the formatting was not correct in my > > > > previous > > > > > >>>>>> mail. A > > > > > >>>>>>>> better formatted version is available here: > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VC8lCeErx9kI5lCMPiUn625PO0rxR-iKlVqtt3hkVnk > > > > > >>>>>>>> Sorry for that. > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Regards, > > > > > >>>>>>>> Gábor > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> On 9 March 2016 at 15:51, Gábor Horváth < > > xazax....@gmail.com> > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Hi,I did not want to send this proposal out before the I > > have > > > > > some > > > > > >>>>>>>>> initial benchmarks, but this issue was mentioned on the > > > mailing > > > > > >>>> list > > > > > >>>>>> ( > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/Tuple-performance-and-the-curious-JIT-compiler-td10666.html > > > > > >>>>>>> ), > > > > > >>>>>>>>> and I wanted to make this information available to be > able > > to > > > > > >>>>>>> incorporate > > > > > >>>>>>>>> this into that discussion. I have written this draft with > > the > > > > > help > > > > > >>>> of > > > > > >>>>>>> Gábor > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Gévay and Márton Balassi and I am open to every > suggestion. > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> The proposal draft: > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Code Generation in Serializers and Comparators of Apache > > > Flink > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> I am doing my last semester of my MSc studies and I’m a > > > former > > > > > GSoC > > > > > >>>>>>>>> student in the LLVM project. I plan to improve the > > > > serialization > > > > > >>>>>> code in > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Flink during this summer. The current implementation of > the > > > > > >>>>>> serializers > > > > > >>>>>>> can > > > > > >>>>>>>>> be a performance bottleneck in some scenarios. These > > > > performance > > > > > >>>>>>> problems > > > > > >>>>>>>>> were also reported on the mailing list recently [1]. I > plan > > > to > > > > > >>>>>> implement > > > > > >>>>>>>>> code generation into the serializers to improve the > > > performance > > > > > (as > > > > > >>>>>>> Stephan > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Ewen also suggested.) > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> TODO: I plan to include some preliminary benchmarks in > this > > > > > >>>> section. > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Performance problems with the current serializers > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> 1. > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> PojoSerializer uses reflection for accessing the fields, > > > which > > > > > >>>> is > > > > > >>>>>>>>> slow (eg. [2]) > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> This is also a serious problem for the comparators > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> 1. > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> When deserializing fields of primitive types (eg. int), > > the > > > > > >>>>>> reusing > > > > > >>>>>>>>> overload of the corresponding field serializers cannot > > > really > > > > do > > > > > >>>>>> any > > > > > >>>>>>> reuse, > > > > > >>>>>>>>> because boxed primitive types are immutable in Java. > This > > > > > >>>> results > > > > > >>>>>> in > > > > > >>>>>>> lots > > > > > >>>>>>>>> of object creations. [3][7] > > > > > >>>>>>>>> 2. > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> The loop to call the field serializers makes virtual > > > function > > > > > >>>>>> calls, > > > > > >>>>>>>>> that cannot be speculatively devirtualized by the JVM or > > > > > >>>> predicted > > > > > >>>>>>> by the > > > > > >>>>>>>>> CPU, because different serializer subclasses are invoked > > for > > > > the > > > > > >>>>>>> different > > > > > >>>>>>>>> fields. (And the loop cannot be unrolled, because the > > number > > > > of > > > > > >>>>>>> iterations > > > > > >>>>>>>>> is not a compile time constant.) See also the following > > > > > >>>> discussion > > > > > >>>>>>> on the > > > > > >>>>>>>>> mailing list [1]. > > > > > >>>>>>>>> 3. > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> A POJO field can have the value null, so the serializer > > > > inserts > > > > > >>>> 1 > > > > > >>>>>>>>> byte null tags, which wastes space. (Also, the type > > > extractor > > > > > >>>>>> logic > > > > > >>>>>>> does > > > > > >>>>>>>>> not distinguish between primitive types and their boxed > > > > > >>>> versions, > > > > > >>>>>> so > > > > > >>>>>>> even > > > > > >>>>>>>>> an int field has a null tag.) > > > > > >>>>>>>>> 4. > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Subclass tags also add a byte at the beginning of every > > POJO > > > > > >>>>>>>>> 5. > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> getLength() does not know the size in most cases [4] > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Knowing the size of a type when serialized has numerous > > > > > >>>>>> performance > > > > > >>>>>>>>> benefits throughout Flink: > > > > > >>>>>>>>> 1. > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Sorters can do in-place, when the type is small [5] > > > > > >>>>>>>>> 2. > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Chaining hash tables do not need resizes, because > they > > > know > > > > > >>>> how > > > > > >>>>>>>>> many buckets to allocate upfront [6] > > > > > >>>>>>>>> 3. > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Different hash table architectures could be used, eg. > > > open > > > > > >>>>>>>>> addressing with linear probing instead of some > chaining > > > > > >>>>>>>>> 4. > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> It is possible to deserialize, modify, and then > > serialize > > > > > >>>> back > > > > > >>>>>> a > > > > > >>>>>>>>> record to its original place, because it cannot > happen > > > that > > > > > >>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>> modified > > > > > >>>>>>>>> version does not fit in the place allocated there for > > the > > > > old > > > > > >>>>>>> version (see > > > > > >>>>>>>>> CompactingHashTable and ReduceHashTable for concrete > > > > > >>>> instances > > > > > >>>>>> of > > > > > >>>>>>> this > > > > > >>>>>>>>> problem) > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Note, that 2. and 3. are problems with not just the > > > > > PojoSerializer, > > > > > >>>>>> but > > > > > >>>>>>>>> also with the TupleSerializer. > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Solution approaches > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> 1. > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Run time code generation for every POJO > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> 1. and 3 . would be automatically solved, if the > > > > serializers > > > > > >>>>>> for > > > > > >>>>>>>>> POJOs would be generated on-the-fly (by, for example, > > > > > >>>>>> Javassist) > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> 2. also needs code generation, and also some extra > > effort > > > > in > > > > > >>>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>>>> type extractor to distinguish between primitive types > > and > > > > > >>>> their > > > > > >>>>>>> boxed > > > > > >>>>>>>>> versions > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> could be used for PojoComparator as well (which could > > > > greatly > > > > > >>>>>>>>> increase the performance of sorting) > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> 1. > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Annotations on POJOs (by the users) > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Concretely: > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> annotate fields that will never be nulls -> no > null > > > tag > > > > > >>>>>> needed > > > > > >>>>>>>>> before every field! > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> make a POJO final -> no subclass tag needed > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> annotating a POJO that it will not be null -> no > top > > > > level > > > > > >>>>>> null > > > > > >>>>>>>>> tag needed > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> These would also help with the getLength problem > (6.), > > > > > >>>> because > > > > > >>>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>>>> length is often not known because currently anything > > can > > > be > > > > > >>>>>> null > > > > > >>>>>>> or a > > > > > >>>>>>>>> subclass can appear anywhere > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> These annotations could be done without code > > generation, > > > > but > > > > > >>>>>> then > > > > > >>>>>>>>> they would add some overhead when there are no > > > annotations > > > > > >>>>>>> present, so this > > > > > >>>>>>>>> would work better together with the code generation > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Tuples would become a special case of POJOs, where > > > nothing > > > > > >>>> can > > > > > >>>>>> be > > > > > >>>>>>>>> null, and no subclass can appear, so maybe we could > > > > eliminate > > > > > >>>>>> the > > > > > >>>>>>>>> TupleSerializer > > > > > >>>>>>>>> - > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> We could annotate some internal types in Flink > > libraries > > > > > >>>> (Gelly > > > > > >>>>>>>>> (Vertex, Edge), FlinkML) > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> TODO: what is the situation with Scala case classes? Run > > time > > > > > code > > > > > >>>>>>>>> generation is probably easier in Scala? (with > quasiquotes) > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> About me > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> I am in the last year of my Computer Science MSc studies > at > > > > > Eotvos > > > > > >>>>>>> Lorand > > > > > >>>>>>>>> University in Budapest, and planning to start a PhD in > the > > > > > autumn. > > > > > >>>> I > > > > > >>>>>>> have > > > > > >>>>>>>>> been working for almost three years at Ericsson on static > > > > > analysis > > > > > >>>>>> tools > > > > > >>>>>>>>> for C++. In 2014 I participated in GSoC, working on the > > LLVM > > > > > >>>> project, > > > > > >>>>>>> and I > > > > > >>>>>>>>> am a frequent contributor ever since. The next summer I > was > > > > > >>>>>> interning at > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Apple. > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> I learned about the Flink project not too long ago and I > > like > > > > it > > > > > so > > > > > >>>>>> far. > > > > > >>>>>>>>> The last few weeks I was working on some tickets to > > > familiarize > > > > > >>>>>> myself > > > > > >>>>>>> with > > > > > >>>>>>>>> the codebase: > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3422 > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3322 > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3457 > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> My CV is available here: > > > > > http://xazax.web.elte.hu/files/resume.pdf > > > > > >>>>>>>>> References > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> [1] > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/Tuple-performance-and-the-curious-JIT-compiler-td10666.html > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> [2] > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/api/java/typeutils/runtime/PojoSerializer.java#L369 > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> [3] > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/api/common/typeutils/base/IntSerializer.java#L73 > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> [4] > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/api/common/typeutils/TypeSerializer.java#L98 > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> [5] > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/operators/sort/FixedLengthRecordSorter.java > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> [6] > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/operators/hash/CompactingHashTable.java#L861 > > > > > >>>>>>>>> [7] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3277 > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Best Regards, > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Gábor > > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
