-1 (binding) the quickstart for 0.10.2 has the Flink version set to 0.10-SNAPSHOT, not to 0.10.2. https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1060/org/apache/flink/flink-quickstart-java/0.10.2/flink-quickstart-java-0.10.2.jar
The same applies to the 0.10.2-hadoop1 version: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1060/org/apache/flink/flink-quickstart-java_2.11/0.10.2-hadoop1/ The jar of the 0.10.1 release is correct: http://search.maven.org/remotecontent?filepath=org/apache/flink/flink-quickstart-java/0.10.1/flink-quickstart-java-0.10.1.jar Good checks: - Source archive is free of binaries - the flink-dist jar doesn't contain guava On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - build against Scala 2.11 > - start-local (CLI, Webclient, Dashboard, log files, examples with build-in > and external data) > - start-cluster, local (2 JVMs, CLI + Webclient, Dashboard, log files, > examples with build-in and external data) > > 2016-02-07 20:21 GMT+01:00 Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org>: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > - Checked checksums > > - No binaries in source release > > - Ran mvn clean verify > > - Build for Hadoop 2.7 > > - Checked version in POM files > > - Ran the start up scripts and examined log/out files > > - Ran tests on multi-node cluster > > - Tested with HDFS > > - Tested command line client > > - Ran examples on YARN cluster (Hadoop 2.7) > > - Tested recovery with StreamingStateMachine (YARN/Standalone) > > > > – Ufuk > > > > > On 06 Feb 2016, at 17:34, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > - Built the code (Linux x64, Scala 2.10, Hadoop 2.3.0) > > > - Ran all tests > > > - Checked that there are no cross-version dependencies > > > - Checked that LICENSE and NOTICE are up to date > > > - Check planVisualizer util > > > - ran examples from command line > > > - tested web frontend on Firefox and Chrome > > > - ran program on multiple taskmanagers, killed one during execution, > > > recovery worked properly > > > > > > > > > Minor issue: The log4j.properties in "flink-runtime" causes a lot of > test > > > exceptions to be printed, which looks confusing when running the tests. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > >> Fair enough > > >> > > >> 2016-02-05 14:09 GMT+01:00 Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>: > > >> > > >>> I would also be in favor of continuing the RC, if we find nothing > more > > >>> problematic > > >>> > > >>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Thanks for the RC. The documentation version is a really minor issue > > >>>> which most people won't even notice because they use the online > > >>>> documentation. I wouldn't create a new RC just for fixing that. > > >>>> > > >>>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> > wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> On 05 Feb 2016, at 12:17, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> I compared the RC1 branch to the release-0.10.2 tag and went over > > >> the > > >>>> diff > > >>>>>> (less than 2k changed lines, mostly added tests). > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Issues: > > >>>>>> - the docs/_config.yml needs to be updated to version 0.10.2 > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Added / changed dependencies in pom files: > > >>>>>> - Kryo was added to flink-storm > > >>>>>> - ASM was added to flink-gelly-scala > > >>>>>> - zkclient was added to flink-connector-kafka > > >>>>>> - Netty was downgraded to version 4.0.27.Final in the root pom.xml > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> All of these dependencies changes are fine because we had > > >> dependencies > > >>>> on > > >>>>>> these artifacts already. > > >>>>>> I did not see any added dependencies (web stuff, etc). > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -1 for the RC due to the non-updated docs config. However, I'd > > >> suggest > > >>>> to > > >>>>>> continue testing this RC before creating a new one. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> We had this issue before with the docs. I would actually like to > not > > >>>> block the release on this, because the docs on the website are > updated > > >>> from > > >>>> the 0.10 release branch anyways and this will only affect people who > > >>> check > > >>>> out the docs locally. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> If you insist or other people see this as a blocker as well, I can > > >>>> certainly create another RC. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> – Ufuk > > >>>>> > > >>>>> PS: I’ve added a note to the releasing Wiki entry. > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > >
