I was typing with fat fingers again. Meant "dropping code" of course, not "dripping" ;-)
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > 2016-01-08 17:35 GMT+01:00 Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org>: > > > +1 since it increase maintainability of the code base if it is not really > > used and thus removed. > > > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > I wanted to make a similar proposal. > > > > > > – Ufuk > > > > > > > On 08 Jan 2016, at 17:03, Kostas Tzoumas <ktzou...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > for clarification, I was talking about dropping the code, I am unsure > > > about > > > > the consequences of dripping code :-) > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Kostas Tzoumas <ktzou...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> +1 from my side > > > >> > > > >> Flink on Tez never got a lot of user traction. It served well as a > > > >> prototype of "this is possible", but since the core functionality > will > > > be > > > >> subsumed by making Flink on YARN resource elastic, I don't see any > > > reason > > > >> we should have it as part of the Flink codebase. > > > >> > > > >> Best, > > > >> Kostas > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> Hi all! > > > >>> > > > >>> Currently, Flink has a module to run batch program code on Tez > rather > > > than > > > >>> Flink's own distributed execution engine. > > > >>> > > > >>> I would suggest that we drop this code for the next release (1.0) > as > > > part > > > >>> of a code consolidation: > > > >>> > > > >>> - There seems little in both the Flink and the Tez community to > use > > > and > > > >>> expand this functionality. > > > >>> > > > >>> - The original motivation (better exploit resource elasticity in > > YARN) > > > >>> will no longer be valid in the near future. I am re-working the > YARN > > > >>> integration currently to make it more elastic and make it possible > to > > > run > > > >>> Flink on Mesos. > > > >>> > > > >>> - The Flink-on-Tez code is rather POC status. Large scale testing > it > > > and > > > >>> making adding all missing features will take more effort than > making > > > >>> Flink's own YARN integration resource elastic. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Please let me know what you think! > > > >>> Especially @Kostas, since you wrote the initial POC, I'd be > > interested > > > in > > > >>> your opinion. > > > >>> > > > >>> Greetings, > > > >>> Stephan > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
