+1 2016-01-08 17:35 GMT+01:00 Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org>:
> +1 since it increase maintainability of the code base if it is not really > used and thus removed. > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > I wanted to make a similar proposal. > > > > – Ufuk > > > > > On 08 Jan 2016, at 17:03, Kostas Tzoumas <ktzou...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > for clarification, I was talking about dropping the code, I am unsure > > about > > > the consequences of dripping code :-) > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Kostas Tzoumas <ktzou...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > >> +1 from my side > > >> > > >> Flink on Tez never got a lot of user traction. It served well as a > > >> prototype of "this is possible", but since the core functionality will > > be > > >> subsumed by making Flink on YARN resource elastic, I don't see any > > reason > > >> we should have it as part of the Flink codebase. > > >> > > >> Best, > > >> Kostas > > >> > > >> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> > wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi all! > > >>> > > >>> Currently, Flink has a module to run batch program code on Tez rather > > than > > >>> Flink's own distributed execution engine. > > >>> > > >>> I would suggest that we drop this code for the next release (1.0) as > > part > > >>> of a code consolidation: > > >>> > > >>> - There seems little in both the Flink and the Tez community to use > > and > > >>> expand this functionality. > > >>> > > >>> - The original motivation (better exploit resource elasticity in > YARN) > > >>> will no longer be valid in the near future. I am re-working the YARN > > >>> integration currently to make it more elastic and make it possible to > > run > > >>> Flink on Mesos. > > >>> > > >>> - The Flink-on-Tez code is rather POC status. Large scale testing it > > and > > >>> making adding all missing features will take more effort than making > > >>> Flink's own YARN integration resource elastic. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Please let me know what you think! > > >>> Especially @Kostas, since you wrote the initial POC, I'd be > interested > > in > > >>> your opinion. > > >>> > > >>> Greetings, > > >>> Stephan > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
