Hmm, it took IntelliJ some time to figure out all the consequences of removing the Record API. Seems to be more than I initially expected.
@Chesnay, do you want to help? I would push my current version to my repository and you could take over some packages and fix the tests. Just reply to me directly to coordinate. Thanks. 2015-10-22 16:45 GMT+02:00 Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com>: > I just deleted the Record API to check what would break. > Doesn't look too scary, just a few tests that need to be adapted. I'm > right in the middle of that. Hope to open a PR soon. > > 2015-10-22 16:42 GMT+02:00 Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org>: > >> @RecordAPI: Yes, i was curious where we are at regarding the removal of >> the Record API. >> If there are still tests left to port (or other related things) I'd be >> more than happy to do it (got a /lot/ of free time on my hands). >> The related JIRA issues weren't particularly helpful though in figuring >> out what still needs to be done. >> >> @Project Restructuring: I prefer doing it now. >> >> >> On 22.10.2015 15:54, Till Rohrmann wrote: >> >>> This reminded me that at some point we wanted to remove the old record >>> API ( >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1681). I think that Chesnay >>> checked with Henry on this topic in JIRA. >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I'd like to bring up Vasia's question on the project structure. >>>> >>>> Stephan started the discussion and proposed a new project structure >>>> about >>>> three weeks ago [1]. >>>> The proposal was refined a bit and eventually backed by many +1s. >>>> >>>> Do we want to make this happen in 0.10 or do we postpone it after the >>>> release? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Fabian >>>> >>>> [1][ >>>> >>>> >>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/flink-dev/201510.mbox/%3CCANC1h_u6qtEsF1WCcoU1d38JGd%2BXTAQWmvp9Stx4vfe68BOjBw%40mail.gmail.com%3E >>>> >>>> >>>> 2015-10-22 15:10 GMT+02:00 Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org>: >>>> >>>> We r actually targeting Flink 0.10, since 0.10 would be out by the time >>>>> >>>> we >>>> >>>>> have Flink-Mahout integration in place. >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Forget my last mail. Just found out that the Mahout guys are still >>>>>> >>>>> running >>>>> >>>>>> on 0.9-SNAPSHOT. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I found another issue (FLINK-2894 >>>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2894>) while helping >>>>>>> >>>>>> the >>>> >>>>> mahout guys with the flink bindings for Samsara. Currently we don't >>>>>>> >>>>>> allow >>>>> >>>>>> to register default serializer for Kryo. This means it is not >>>>>>> >>>>>> possible >>>> >>>>> to >>>>> >>>>>> specify a serializer for a base class and all its subclasses. In >>>>>>> >>>>>> order >>>> >>>>> to >>>>> >>>>>> push the flink integration with Samsara, I would like to include a >>>>>>> >>>>>> fix >>>> >>>>> for >>>>>> >>>>>>> it in 0.10. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Sachin Goel < >>>>>>> >>>>>> sachingoel0...@gmail.com >>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Oct 22, 2015 3:01 PM, "Maximilian Michels" <m...@apache.org> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> @Stephan: That's right, the detached mode is very useful for >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> streaming >>>>> >>>>>> programs. Let's see if we can merge Sachin's pull request to give >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> more >>>>> >>>>>> meaningful exceptions in case of user programs which are not >>>>>>>>> compatible with the detached execution mode. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'll leave it up to you guys to make a decision on it then. But >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> something >>>>>> >>>>>>> needs to be done about it. :') >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> @Vasia: That's a feature :) You can adjust the number of old jobs >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> to >>>> >>>>> be kept by setting 'jobmanager.web.history' (default is 5). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Vasiliki Kalavri >>>>>>>>> <vasilikikala...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I found an issue with the web interface. It only shows the last >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 5 >>>> >>>>> finished >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> jobs and the "Jobs Finished" counter also goes up to 5. >>>>>>>>>> I found FLINK-2206, but it seems that this was fixed for the old >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> interface >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and broken again in the new one? >>>>>>>>>> Shall I open another issue or is there something I need to >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> configure >>>>> >>>>>> in >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> new web interface and I haven't? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>> -V. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 22 October 2015 at 11:20, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I am onto FLINK-2800 and FLINK-2888 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I would not disable YARN detached mode, it is used quite a bit >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> by >>>> >>>>> streaming >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> users and makes perfect sense for streaming jobs, which are >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> always >>>>> >>>>>> one-shot >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> currently. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Maximilian Michels < >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> m...@apache.org >>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I had a gut feeling this wouldn't be the last RC :) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I second Stephan, Ufuk, and Fabian. It's a good idea to start >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> testing the >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> release candidate. We might discover more issues on the way. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> In >>>> >>>>> the >>>>>> >>>>>>> meantime, let's fix FLINK-2763 and FLINK-2800 and push those >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> to >>>> >>>>> the >>>>>> >>>>>>> release-0.10 branch. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Eager execution calls are not supported by the detached YARN >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> execution >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> mode. The Flink standalone cluster mode doesn't have a >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> detached >>>> >>>>> mode. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sachin was working on throwing a proper exception for >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> programs >>>> >>>>> that >>>>>> >>>>>>> try >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> submit a job which contains eager execution calls. In the >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> course >>>>> >>>>>> of >>>>>> >>>>>>> throwing a proper exception, he also added detached execution >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> mode >>>>>> >>>>>>> support >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> for the standalone cluster mode. The reason why eager >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> execution >>>> >>>>> doesn't >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> work with detached programs is that the client submits the >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> first >>>>> >>>>>> Flink >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> job >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> (call to execute/count/collect/print) to the cluster and then >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> returns an >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> empty ExecutionResult. This leads to error if the user >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> program >>>> >>>>> tries >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> access the ExecutionResult. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Sachin's pull request hasn't been merged in time for the >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> release. I >>>>>> >>>>>>> would >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> like Flink to support detached execution mode but I suggest >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> to >>>> >>>>> disable >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> detached execution mode for YARN in this release. We can >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> include >>>>> >>>>>> a >>>>>> >>>>>>> proper >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> support for the next release. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Sachin Goel < >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> sachingoel0...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure if it's a blocker, but the yarn detached mode is >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> faulty >>>>>> >>>>>>> for >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> interactive programs with eager execution calls. The most >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> basic >>>>> >>>>>> starting >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> point for yarn, i.e. *bin/flink run -m yarn-cluster -yd -n >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> <> >>>> >>>>> examples/Wordcount.jar* fails in a bad way. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- Sachin Goel >>>>>>>>>>>>> Computer Science, IIT Delhi >>>>>>>>>>>>> m. +91-9871457685 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 3:57 AM, fhueske < >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> fhue...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 to that, Stephan. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can help with FLINK-2763 or FLINK-2800. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Stephan Ewen >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 0:02 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: dev@flink.apache.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.10.0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (release-0.10.0-rc0) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From my side 2888 is a valid blocker. Aljoscha also found >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> another >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> blocker >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> bug, so this RC will need a few patches. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think for 2824 there was no consensus to what would >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> actually >>>>>> >>>>>>> be the >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> desired behavior, which makes it a bad candidate for a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> release >>>>>> >>>>>>> blocker. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I would try and fix FLINK-2763 and FLINK-2800 if >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> possible, >>>> >>>>> but >>>>>> >>>>>>> not >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> block >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the release on that. They seem to be very corner case. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Good >>>> >>>>> to >>>>>> >>>>>>> fix >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> them, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> but not blockers. Too many people are on the 0.10 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT >>>> >>>>> right >>>>>>>> now >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> too many urgent fixes are in that people wait to be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> available >>>>> >>>>>> in >>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> release. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> How about we start testing anyways, because I would >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> expect >>>> >>>>> us >>>>> >>>>>> to >>>>>>>> find >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> more >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues, and we save time if we do not create a new >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> release >>>> >>>>> candidate >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> each patch. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Flavio Pompermaier < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> pomperma...@okkam.it >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would also point out that Flink-2763 and Flink-2800 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> could >>>>> >>>>>> be >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> worth >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> further investigations before this release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flavio >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21 Oct 2015 23:33, "Gyula Fóra" <gyf...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks Max for the effort, this is going to be huge >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :) >>>> >>>>> Unfortunately I have to say -1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FLINK-2888 and FLINK-2824 are blockers from my point >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>> >>>>> view. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gyula >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Vasiliki Kalavri <vasilikikala...@gmail.com> ezt >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> írta >>>> >>>>> (időpont: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2015. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> okt. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 21., Sze, 20:07): >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome! Thanks Max :)) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a couple of questions: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - what about the blocker issue (according to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wiki) >>>>> >>>>>> FLINK-2747? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - weren't we going to get rid of staging >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> altogether? >>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -V. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21 October 2015 at 19:54, Stephan Ewen < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> se...@apache.org >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Super, thanks Max! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We should also bump the master to the next >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version >>>> >>>>> then, >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> separate >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> goes into release fixes and what goes into the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> next >>>> >>>>> version... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Is that going to be 1.0-SNAPSHOT? ;-) That is a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> separate >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> thread, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> guess... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Maximilian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michels < >>>>> >>>>>> m...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Release candidates have to be tested >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly. >>>> >>>>> Therefore, I >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everybody to take a look at the release page in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>> >>>>>> wiki: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/0.10+Release >>>> >>>>> I've compiled the checks into a document. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would >>>> >>>>> like >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> everyone >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assign >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one of the checks in the documents to test the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> candidate: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TWCFj55xTyJjGYe8x9YEqmICgSvcexDPlbgP4CnLpLY/edit?usp=sharing >>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Maximilian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Michels < >>>>>> >>>>>>> m...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear community, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The past months we have been working very >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hard >>>> >>>>> to >>>>> >>>>>> push >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> towards >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.10. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would like to propose the first release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate. >>>>>> >>>>>>> =================================== >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate >>>>> >>>>>> as >>>>>> >>>>>>> Apache >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Flink >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.10.0: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The commit to be voted on: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b697064b71b97e51703caae13660038949d41631 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Branch: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-0.10.0-rc0 (see >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/?p=flink.git >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The release artifacts to be voted on can be >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found >>>>> >>>>>> at: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mxm/flink-0.10.0-rc0/ >>>>> >>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the key >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>> >>>>> fingerprint >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> C2909CBF: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>> >>>>> found >>>>>>>> at: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1047 >>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache >>>> >>>>> Flink >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 0.10.0. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passes >>>>> >>>>>> if >>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> majority >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least three +1 PMC votes are cast. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote ends on Monday October 26, 2015. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 0.10.0 >>>>>> >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... >>>> >>>>> =================================== >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >> >
