However, you can only restart runs in your travis account, not on the apache account (also used for validating pull requests).
I have opened a pull request a few minutes ago which will reduce the number of KafakITCase failures (there is still one other unresolved issue). On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > don't worry, there are very few stupid questions. :D > > The KafkaITCase sometimes fails on Travis, this is a known problem > currently. On travis you can restart the individual runs for a commit > in the view of the failed run. > > Hope that helps. > > Cheers, > Aljoscha > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Lokesh Rajaram > <rajaram.lok...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks Aljoscha, Robert. After adding guava dependency for flink-spargel > I > > was able to progress further but now it's failing in > > flink-streaming-connectors for the following test case: > > > > KafkaITCase.brokerFailureTest:936->tryExecute:352 Test failed with: Job > > execution failed. > > > > Any pointers would help me proceed further. Sorry for a lot of trivial > > questions, I am just getting started not familiar with the code base. > > I tried running locally, I am able to run it successfully, don't know why > > it's only failing in Travis build. Not sure if I am missing something in > my > > local environment. > > > > Thanks, > > Lokesh > > > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >> I think flink-spargel is missing the guava dependency. > >> > >> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > @Robert, this seems like a problem with the Shading? > >> > > >> > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 5:41 AM, Lokesh Rajaram > >> > <rajaram.lok...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > Thanks Aljioscha. I was able to change as recommended and able to > run > >> the > >> > > entire test suite in local successfully. > >> > > However Travis build is failing for pull request: > >> > > https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/673. > >> > > > >> > > It's a compilation failure: > >> > > > >> > > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal > >> > > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.1:compile > >> > > (default-compile) on project flink-spargel: Compilation failure: > >> > > Compilation failure: > >> > > [ERROR] > >> > > > >> > > >> > /home/travis/build/apache/flink/flink-staging/flink-spargel/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/spargel/java/VertexCentricIteration.java:[42,30] > >> > > package com.google.common.base does not exist > >> > > > >> > > I can definitely see the package imported in the class, compiling > and > >> > > passing all tests in local. > >> > > Anything I am missing here? > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Lokesh > >> > > > >> > > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 1:25 AM, Aljoscha Krettek < > aljos...@apache.org > >> > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> I think you can replace Validate.NotNull(p) with require(p != > null, "p > >> > >> is null (or something like this)"). > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Lokesh Rajaram > >> > >> <rajaram.lok...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > 1. I think I can use require for replacing Validate.isTrue > >> > >> > 2. What about Validate.notNull? If require is used it would throw > >> > >> > IllegalArgumentException, > >> > >> > if assume or assert is used it would throw AssertionError which > is > >> not > >> > >> > compatible with current implementation. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Please let me know if my understanding is correct. Also, let me > know > >> > your > >> > >> > thoughts. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Thanks, > >> > >> > Lokesh > >> > >> > > >> > >> > On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Aljoscha Krettek < > >> > aljos...@apache.org> > >> > >> > wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > >> >> I would propose using the methods as Chiwan suggested. If > everyone > >> > >> >> agrees I can change the Jira issue. > >> > >> >> > >> > >> >> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Lokesh Rajaram > >> > >> >> <rajaram.lok...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >> > Thank you for the reference links. Which approach should I > take, > >> > >> casting > >> > >> >> or > >> > >> >> > use scala methods. > >> > >> >> > If it's the latter option will the JIRA ticket FLINK-1711 > >> > >> >> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1711> be > updated to > >> > >> >> reflect it? > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > Thanks, > >> > >> >> > Lokesh > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Chiwan Park < > >> chiwanp...@icloud.com > >> > > > >> > >> >> wrote: > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> Hi. There is some problems using Guava’s check method in > Scala. > >> ( > >> > >> >> >> > >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/guava-discuss/juwovq26R3k > >> > < > >> > >> >> >> > >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/guava-discuss/juwovq26R3k > >> > >) > >> > >> You > >> > >> >> >> can solve this error simply with casting last argument to > >> > >> >> java.lang.Object. > >> > >> >> >> But I think we’d better use `require`, `assume`, `assert` > method > >> > >> >> provided > >> > >> >> >> by Scala. ( > >> > >> >> >> > >> http://daily-scala.blogspot.kr/2010/03/assert-require-assume.html > >> > < > >> > >> >> >> > >> http://daily-scala.blogspot.kr/2010/03/assert-require-assume.html > >> > >) > >> > >> >> >> Because this changes affects many other codes, so we should > >> > discuss > >> > >> >> about > >> > >> >> >> changing Guava's method to Scala’s method. > >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> Regards. > >> > >> >> >> Chiwan Park (Sent with iPhone) > >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > On May 10, 2015, at 11:49 AM, Lokesh Rajaram < > >> > >> >> rajaram.lok...@gmail.com> > >> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> > >> >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> > Hello All, > >> > >> >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> > I am new to Flink community and am very excited about the > >> > project > >> > >> and > >> > >> >> >> work > >> > >> >> >> > you all have been doing. Kudos!! > >> > >> >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> > I was looking to pickup some starter task. Robert > recommended > >> to > >> > >> pick > >> > >> >> up > >> > >> >> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1711. Thanks > >> Robert > >> > >> for > >> > >> >> your > >> > >> >> >> > guidance. > >> > >> >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> > Sorry for a dumb question. I am done with code changes but > my > >> > "mvn > >> > >> >> >> verify" > >> > >> >> >> > failing only for the scala module as follows > >> > >> >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > flink/flink-scala/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/api/scala/joinDataSet.scala:77: > >> > >> >> >> > error: ambiguous reference to overloaded definition, > >> > >> >> >> > [ERROR] both method checkNotNull in object Preconditions of > >> type > >> > >> >> [T](x$1: > >> > >> >> >> > T, x$2: String, x$3: <repeated...>[Object])T > >> > >> >> >> > [ERROR] and method checkNotNull in object Preconditions of > >> type > >> > >> >> [T](x$1: > >> > >> >> >> > T, x$2: Any)T > >> > >> >> >> > [ERROR] match argument types ((L, R) => O,String) > >> > >> >> >> > [ERROR] Preconditions.checkNotNull(fun, "Join function > >> must > >> > >> not be > >> > >> >> >> > null.") > >> > >> >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> > Same error I see for all of the Scala classes I changed. > Any > >> > >> pointers > >> > >> >> >> here > >> > >> >> >> > will be very helpful for me to proceed further. Please let > me > >> > know > >> > >> if > >> > >> >> you > >> > >> >> >> > need more information. > >> > >> >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> > Thanks in advance for your help and support. > >> > >> >> >> > > >> > >> >> >> > Thanks, > >> > >> >> >> > Lokesh > >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> >
