+1 Let's merge it to flink-staging and get some people to use it. On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Kostas Tzoumas <ktzou...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'm +1 for this > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > The Python API pull request [1] has been open for quite some time now. > > > > I was wondering whether we are planning to merge it or not. > > I took a closer look at the Python API a few weeks ago and I think we > > should merge it to expose it to our users to collect feedback. > > I hope by merging it, we'll find additional contributors for it and we > get > > more feedback. > > > > Since it will be located in the "flink-staging" module and we'll mark it > as > > a beta component, there is not much risk that we break any existing code. > > > > Please give me some +1's if you want to merge the Python API PR. > > I'd like to merge it in the next 24 to 48 hours, depending on the > feedback > > I'm getting in this thread here. > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/202 > > >
