+1

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> 2015-04-20 14:39 GMT+02:00 Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org>:
>
> > +1 Let's merge it to flink-staging and get some people to use it.
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Kostas Tzoumas <ktzou...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'm +1 for this
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > The Python API pull request [1] has been open for quite some time
> now.
> > > >
> > > > I was wondering whether we are planning to merge it or not.
> > > > I took a closer look at the Python API a few weeks ago and I think we
> > > > should merge it to expose it to our users to collect feedback.
> > > > I hope by merging it, we'll find additional contributors for it and
> we
> > > get
> > > > more feedback.
> > > >
> > > > Since it will be located in the "flink-staging" module and we'll mark
> > it
> > > as
> > > > a beta component, there is not much risk that we break any existing
> > code.
> > > >
> > > > Please give me some +1's if you want to merge the Python API PR.
> > > > I'd like to merge it in the next 24 to 48 hours, depending on the
> > > feedback
> > > > I'm getting in this thread here.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/202
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to