I like the Relation or Relational. So maybe we could use DataRelation as the abstraction?
- Henry On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am also more in favor of Rel and Relation, but DataTable nicely follows > the terms DataSet and DataStream. > On Mar 16, 2015 4:58 PM, "Aljoscha Krettek" <aljos...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I like Relation or Rel, is shorter. >> On Mar 16, 2015 4:52 PM, "Hermann Gábor" <reckone...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > +1 for DataTable >> > >> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 4:11 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > +1 for DataTable >> > > >> > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Márton Balassi < >> > balassi.mar...@gmail.com >> > > > >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > +1 for Max's suggestion. >> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Maximilian Michels < >> m...@apache.org> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks for starting the discussion. We should definitely not keep >> > > > > > flink-expressions. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I'm in favor of DataTable for the DataSet abstraction equivalent. >> > For >> > > > > > consistency, the package name should then be flink-table. At >> first >> > > > > > sight, the name seems kind of plain but I think it is quite >> > intuitive >> > > > > > because the API enables you to work in a SQL like fashion. >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > +1 >> > > > > >> > > > > I think this is a very good suggestion. :-) >> > > > > >> > > > > (There is an associated issue, we shouldn't forget to close: >> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1623) >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >>
