I am also more in favor of Rel and Relation, but DataTable nicely follows the terms DataSet and DataStream. On Mar 16, 2015 4:58 PM, "Aljoscha Krettek" <aljos...@apache.org> wrote:
> I like Relation or Rel, is shorter. > On Mar 16, 2015 4:52 PM, "Hermann Gábor" <reckone...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 for DataTable > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 4:11 PM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 for DataTable > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Márton Balassi < > > balassi.mar...@gmail.com > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 for Max's suggestion. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Maximilian Michels < > m...@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for starting the discussion. We should definitely not keep > > > > > > flink-expressions. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm in favor of DataTable for the DataSet abstraction equivalent. > > For > > > > > > consistency, the package name should then be flink-table. At > first > > > > > > sight, the name seems kind of plain but I think it is quite > > intuitive > > > > > > because the API enables you to work in a SQL like fashion. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > I think this is a very good suggestion. :-) > > > > > > > > > > (There is an associated issue, we shouldn't forget to close: > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1623) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
