+1
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org> wrote: >> +1 >> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Kostas Tzoumas <ktzou...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Márton Balassi <mbala...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > When it comes to the current use cases I'm for this separation. >>> > @Ufuk: As Gyula has already pointed out with the current design of >>> > integration it should not be a problem. Even if we submitted programs to >>> > the wrong clusters it would only cause performance issues. >>> > >>> > Eventually it would be nice to have an integrated cluster. >>> > >>> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: >>> > >>> > > I think this separation reflects the way that Flink is used currently >>> > > anyways. I would be in favor of it as well. >>> > > >>> > > - What about the ongoing efforts (I think by Gyula) to combine both the >>> > > batch and stream processing APIs? I assume that this would only effect >>> > the >>> > > performance and wouldn't pose a fundamental problem there, would it? >>> > > >>> > >>>
