+1 On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Kostas Tzoumas <ktzou...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Márton Balassi <mbala...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > When it comes to the current use cases I'm for this separation. > > @Ufuk: As Gyula has already pointed out with the current design of > > integration it should not be a problem. Even if we submitted programs to > > the wrong clusters it would only cause performance issues. > > > > Eventually it would be nice to have an integrated cluster. > > > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > I think this separation reflects the way that Flink is used currently > > > anyways. I would be in favor of it as well. > > > > > > - What about the ongoing efforts (I think by Gyula) to combine both the > > > batch and stream processing APIs? I assume that this would only effect > > the > > > performance and wouldn't pose a fundamental problem there, would it? > > > > > >
