Hi Nicholas, In another thread we talked about adding a banner flex website to make Apache Royale be known for flex users. Could you please add that banner? I was unable to do it. Copy here what we talked in the other thread:
"I think just a visible section (maybe before the main menu or after it), of about 300px-400px height with a message like this: *"For those who need a frontend technology that runs in browsers without Adobe Flash Player, * *please check Apache Royale.* *Apache Flex will still be used outside browsers with desktop technologies (i.e, Adobe AIR) after December 31th, 2020."* And make the "Apache Royale" text link to the website ( https://royale.apache.org). Please correct the spelling to match the right english translation. If possible make the background green or blue and wording white with some sizing so it captures attention." Thanks in advance. Carlos El mié., 26 ago. 2020 a las 14:40, Andrew Wetmore (<andr...@apache.org>) escribió: > Good to know. > > As far as I know, any of the static site generators that support MarkDown > also support traditional HTML, so migrating should not require a general > rewrite. > > Andrew > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 9:18 AM Nicholas Kwiatkowski < > nicholaskwiatkow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hey there -- checking in (this thread ended up in my spam blocker > somehow). > > > > We do still use the CMS, but we didn't use a ton of features in it. We > > mostly used it to glue on a header and footer to the straight HTML pages. > > It looks like the CMSs that were linked in the initial post are mostly > > markdown-based, which we don't use (and it would be a pain to convert > over > > to). > > > > I don't have a ton of time this week -- I'm trying to convert my classes > to > > be online at the last second, again. If anybody else on the list wants > to > > do the research to move it over, I can chime in to help. I should have > > some more time in a few weeks when things settle down. > > > > -Nick > > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 9:12 AM Andrew Wetmore <cottag...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > The migration from the CMS to any of the likely static-site generators > is > > > more like a copy and paste than a rewrite, if the site uses HTML or > > > markdown. > > > > > > a > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 2:34 PM Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I think Tom's idea of dump html is the best. I tried recently to add > a > > > > simple banner on the main home page and must abandon since it was > > > difficult > > > > and use SVN. > > > > > > > > just an html dump where we can easily change a part of html would be > > > > enough for this migration and maintenance > > > > > > > > > > > > El mar., 18 ago. 2020 a las 11:32, Tom Chiverton (< > t...@extravision.com > > >) > > > > escribió: > > > > > > > > > On 18/08/2020 07:45, Olaf Krueger wrote: > > > > > > I took a look into your migration guide and it sounds like that > we > > > have > > > > > to > > > > > > rewrite the entire page by using other technologies, e.g. one of > > the > > > > > static > > > > > > site generators. Is that right? > > > > > > > > > > Surely there has to be a way to just dump raw HTML in a folder and > > have > > > > > it served up... the site doesn't change so that would be easiest > for > > > us ? > > > > > > > > > > Tom > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > > > This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud > > > service. > > > > > For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Carlos Rovira > > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Andrew Wetmore > > > > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > -- > Andrew Wetmore > Technical Writer-Editor > Infra > *Apache Software Foundation* > andr...@apache.org > -- Carlos Rovira http://about.me/carlosrovira
