Good to know. As far as I know, any of the static site generators that support MarkDown also support traditional HTML, so migrating should not require a general rewrite.
Andrew On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 9:18 AM Nicholas Kwiatkowski < nicholaskwiatkow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey there -- checking in (this thread ended up in my spam blocker somehow). > > We do still use the CMS, but we didn't use a ton of features in it. We > mostly used it to glue on a header and footer to the straight HTML pages. > It looks like the CMSs that were linked in the initial post are mostly > markdown-based, which we don't use (and it would be a pain to convert over > to). > > I don't have a ton of time this week -- I'm trying to convert my classes to > be online at the last second, again. If anybody else on the list wants to > do the research to move it over, I can chime in to help. I should have > some more time in a few weeks when things settle down. > > -Nick > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 9:12 AM Andrew Wetmore <cottag...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > The migration from the CMS to any of the likely static-site generators is > > more like a copy and paste than a rewrite, if the site uses HTML or > > markdown. > > > > a > > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 2:34 PM Carlos Rovira <carlosrov...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I think Tom's idea of dump html is the best. I tried recently to add a > > > simple banner on the main home page and must abandon since it was > > difficult > > > and use SVN. > > > > > > just an html dump where we can easily change a part of html would be > > > enough for this migration and maintenance > > > > > > > > > El mar., 18 ago. 2020 a las 11:32, Tom Chiverton (<t...@extravision.com > >) > > > escribió: > > > > > > > On 18/08/2020 07:45, Olaf Krueger wrote: > > > > > I took a look into your migration guide and it sounds like that we > > have > > > > to > > > > > rewrite the entire page by using other technologies, e.g. one of > the > > > > static > > > > > site generators. Is that right? > > > > > > > > Surely there has to be a way to just dump raw HTML in a folder and > have > > > > it served up... the site doesn't change so that would be easiest for > > us ? > > > > > > > > Tom > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > > This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud > > service. > > > > For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Carlos Rovira > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira > > > > > > > > > -- > > Andrew Wetmore > > > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/ > > > -- Andrew Wetmore Technical Writer-Editor Infra *Apache Software Foundation* andr...@apache.org
