https://paste.apache.org/Gcuj <https://paste.apache.org/Gcuj>
> On Jul 7, 2017, at 6:55 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: > > What error did you get? > > The Ant build on the CI server runs checkintests and it is passing there. > > The FlexJS Mustella uses Selenium for the JS run, but some manual > intervention is currently required. > > -Alex > > On 7/7/17, 3:16 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The checkintests target currently fails. I’m guessing the build file was >> not updated for dual. >> >> Selenium has a JS API[1]. It seems like we should be able to write tests >> in MXML and AS and then use Node.js to run the results. I’m not sure how >> easy it would be to generalize tests so that the same tests could be run >> in both Flash and Selenium. It should be an interesting project to try. >> >> We should probably add FlexUnit tests even if they only run in SWF. I >> will make an attempt to do so myself. It seems like it should be possible >> to run the FlexUnit tests in JS using one of the JS unit testing >> frameworks or even rolling our own JS implementation. I don’t think the >> way it’s run is important, but it would be a very good idea to allow >> FlexUnit to run in JS unmodified. >> >> I never quite “got” how the meta tags in FlexUnit actually work. >> >> [1]https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.np >> mjs.com%2Fpackage%2Fselenium-webdriver&data=02%7C01%7C%7C5851203659274db5f >> ae608d4c5214b2a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C6363501941932 >> 82017&sdata=k0RGXQMJAf5YMPo4Cvq%2BXXtn6ELAqhf4USYcj0qdLag%3D&reserved=0 >> <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.npmj >> s.com%2Fpackage%2Fselenium-webdriver&data=02%7C01%7C%7C5851203659274db5fae >> 608d4c5214b2a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636350194193282 >> 017&sdata=k0RGXQMJAf5YMPo4Cvq%2BXXtn6ELAqhf4USYcj0qdLag%3D&reserved=0> >> >>> On Jul 7, 2017, at 1:38 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >>> >>> I have a subset of Mustella working on both platforms in the BasicTests >>> that run from the checkintests target in the Ant build. There is a >>> writeup on Mustella in the wiki >>> >>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcwiki.ap >>> ache.org%2Fconfluence%2Fdisplay%2FFLEX%2FMustella%2BOverview&data=02%7C01 >>> %7C%7C5851203659274db5fae608d4c5214b2a%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1 >>> %7C0%7C0%7C636350194193282017&sdata=0Pnb%2BdCvmgY9UVKOj4lELhkNa3VJBKnrgOA >>> WnOy2cvc%3D&reserved=0. I >>> haven't gone through it to see how much does or doesn't apply to FlexJS. >>> The BasicTests are in the flex-asjs repo in mustella/tests/basicTests. >>> I >>> basically copied the Flex SDK's BasicTests and modified it a bit to run >>> in >>> FlexJS and commented out most tests because back when I did it, we >>> didn't >>> have many components. It might be interesting to comment more tests >>> back >>> in and see if they run. >>> >>> There are some FlexUnit tests that run as part of the Core.swc Ant >>> build, >>> but only on SWF. >>> >>> The Maven build runs some Selenium tests that I think are written in >>> Java, >>> and I think only test JS output. >>> >>> I haven't invested much time in test infrastructure or test creation >>> since >>> there were some strong opinions about not liking Mustella and some >>> thoughts about how to make FlexUnit run on both platforms. >>> >>> My personal preference is that tests should be written in MXML and/or AS >>> and run on both platforms. Bonus points if existing tests can be run >>> unmodified or mostly unmodified. >>> >>> -Alex >>> >>> On 7/6/17, 2:02 PM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Where are the instructions on how to use it? If I know how to write >>>> tests, I’d be much better about doing so… >>>> >>>>> On Jul 6, 2017, at 11:53 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I have put in place a test infrastructure >>>> >>> >> >
