Again, everything I contribute is copyright Adobe and I am authorized to license it under ALv2. So I think we are good.
Do any other PMC members think we need to spend more energy on this issue? There are lots of other things to do. -Alex On 4/24/17, 7:35 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >Hi, > >> >>https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ap >>ache.org%2Fthread.html%2F132d2d65017befe599e4f5fd2e1b148b35bce8&data=02%7 >>C01%7C%7C77d030d070534941f2cb08d48b83b8e8%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178dec >>ee1%7C0%7C0%7C636286845237972385&sdata=xs0cpWy4Fo1%2FwX6T53vFLnAuqOeLV9US >>0Hqriptx2k0%3D&reserved=0 >> 1f2eae7a4e0a5501d0@%3Cdev.flex.apache.org%3E > >So it happened off list, but aside from that it seems that Adobe's ruling >only applied to “CreateJS” externs and not all extern files? > >Also copyright is different to licensing. The files may be copyright >Adobe but how are they licensed given the original CreateJS is MIT >licensed? > >I suggest you ask on legal discuss to clarify the scope (i.e. CreateJS >only or all files) and ask if it’s OK to change the original license >without the owners permission. > >Thanks, >Justin
