OK. I'll take care of it. On 3/7/17, 10:11 PM, "Greg Dove" <greg.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Yes, I think they are errors with the tests. > >iirc it was > ><initialView> ><Label> ><initialView> > >or something like that. So I think the new code is picking up the right >things :) > >I am struggling for time right now, if you have time that would be >fantastic, otherwise I will try to get to it later tonight. > > > > > > > >On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:06 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> Greg, >> >> I just realized that these might be legitimate errors. I can fix them >>if >> you don't have time. >> >> -Alex >> >> On 3/7/17, 1:32 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >> >> > >> > >> >On 3/7/17, 1:04 PM, "Greg Dove" <greg.d...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >>I had never run those tests specifically - I was not even aware of >>those >> >>yet, the unit tests run during ant all build had proceeded without >> >>problems: >> > >> >There are three sets of unit tests. Because the compiler is needed to >> >build the AS framework, we can't have the compiler tests require the AS >> >framework, so the set of tests that runs automatically don't have any >>AS >> >framework dependencies, then there is a set of tests with flex-sdk >> >dependencies and one with flex-asjs dependencies, which is what you >>just >> >ran. >> > >> >Ignore the "Unable to parse" for now. >> > >> >IMO, no need to revert the changes. I've got plenty of other things to >> >do. >> > >> >Thanks for digging into it. >> >-Alex >> > >> >>
