On 3/5/17, 10:15 AM, "Harbs" <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>The code is JS-only, so I think I agree as well. > >Disallowing valid JS values just because it does not work on the swf side >seems silly if the code has no cost on the SWF side. How will we achieve parity on the SWF side? And keep the SWF implementation simple. SWF only knows about "bold" and "normal". That's one reason SimpleCSSStylesImpl is "simple". Having reasonably good fidelity between SWF and JS is a good thing. This JS-only code is fine, but belongs in a different class and/or component set where more code can run to approximate numeric FontWeight or there isn't a promise of SWF/JS fidelity. We do need to eventually do more sophisticated CSS on the SWF side. Maybe now is the time to start that. Thanks, -Alex