On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 9:19 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> That reminds me: it has always bugged me that the compiler makes you
> write:
>
> <fa:FontAwesomeIcon iconType="{FontAwesomeIconType.TWITTER}" />
>
>
> (which sets up a binding), instead of just:
>
> <fa:FontAwesomeIcon iconType="FontAwesomeIconType.TWITTER" />
>
> Can anyone think of a reason the compiler shouldn't allow that?
>
What is the advantage of writing it like this? I mean, to the end user.
>
> Also, maybe more into the future, maybe the constants should be considered
> of type FontAwsomeIconType, which would essentially be like an enum.
>
That sounds like a lot of work for over 500+ icons. Again, what would be
the advantage?
Thanks,
Om
>
> Thoughts?
> -Alex
>
>
>
